AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

BeInCryptovsFinancial Times

BeInCrypto (38.2% hit rate) vs Financial Times (37.5% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 3020 and 3149 checked headlines

BeInCrypto

Ranked #8 of — sources

Metric
Financial Times

Ranked #14 of — sources

Hit rate

38.2%vs37.5%

Checked reports

3,020vs3,149

Articles Analyzed

1,553vs1,783

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

BeInCrypto

Avg. Sentiment: -0.12
Bullish 39%Neutral 4%Bearish 57%

Financial Times

Avg. Sentiment: -0.10
Bullish 37%Neutral 9%Bearish 54%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketBeInCryptoFinancial Times
AI infrastructure bonds—1 (0%)
AMC/Robinhood tokenized1 (0%)—
ARKM Token1 (0%)—
Alphabet1 (0%)—
Amazon1 (0%)—
Anthropic IPO—1 (0%)
Apple1 (0%)—
Arbitrum1 (0%)—
Argentine Peso1 (0%)—
Argentine peso—1 (0%)
Asian stocks20 (1%)85 (6%)
Australian stocks3 (0%)23 (2%)
Avalanche1 (0%)—
BLUR Token1 (0%)—
BNB3 (0%)3 (0%)
Balancer1 (0%)—
Banking & Stablecoins1 (0%)—
Berkshire Hathaway1 (0%)—
Bitcoin441 (30%)18 (1%)
Brazilian markets—1 (0%)
Broadcom1 (0%)—
Cardano26 (2%)—
China 10-year government bonds—1 (0%)
Circle1 (0%)—
Circle Arc blockchain1 (0%)—
Coinbase1 (0%)—
Commodities vs1 (0%)—
Copper2 (0%)2 (0%)
CoreWeave1 (0%)—
Crocs1 (0%)—
DAX1 (0%)10 (1%)
Dell Technologies2 (0%)—
Dogecoin1 (0%)—
EUR/USD—4 (0%)
Ethereum95 (7%)—
European natural gas—1 (0%)
European stocks5 (0%)72 (5%)
French bond—1 (0%)
GBP/USD1 (0%)—
Getty Images1 (0%)—
Glencore—1 (0%)
Gold58 (4%)44 (3%)
Goldman Sachs1 (0%)—
Healthcare1 (0%)—
Hyperliquid2 (0%)—
ICP1 (0%)—
Indian stocks7 (1%)72 (5%)
Indonesian—1 (0%)
Indonesian stock—1 (0%)
Japanese stocks13 (1%)52 (4%)
Kazakh tenge—1 (0%)
Korean1 (0%)—
Korean Tech IPO1 (0%)—
Korean Won1 (0%)—
Korean bond1 (0%)—
Korean markets1 (0%)—
Meta1 (0%)—
MicroStrategy1 (0%)—
Microsoft1 (0%)—
Monero1 (0%)—
NASDAQ12 (1%)12 (1%)
Netflix1 (0%)—
Nike1 (0%)—
Nvidia1 (0%)—
Oil66 (5%)411 (29%)
Palantir1 (0%)—
Polkadot1 (0%)—
Quant1 (0%)—
Ralph Lauren apparel1 (0%)—
SK Hynix1 (0%)—
Salesforce1 (0%)—
Samsung Electronics1 (0%)—
Securitize1 (0%)—
Shipping/Tanker ETFs1 (0%)—
Silver19 (1%)3 (0%)
Solana50 (3%)—
South Korean—1 (0%)
SpaceX2 (0%)—
Starknet1 (0%)—
TRON1 (0%)—
Tesla3 (0%)—
Tokenization1 (0%)—
Tron1 (0%)—
Turkish—1 (0%)
UK markets5 (0%)79 (6%)
UNI1 (0%)—
US Dollar Index1 (0%)—
US Interest Rates1 (0%)—
US banking sector—1 (0%)
US government borrowing costs1 (0%)—
US short-term interest rates—1 (0%)
USA84 (6%)221 (16%)
USD/CNY1 (0%)—
USD/JPY7 (1%)20 (1%)
USDT1 (0%)—
Uniswap1 (0%)—
XRP95 (7%)—
Zcash3 (0%)—
bank1 (0%)—
bond yields1 (0%)—
bonds1 (0%)—
consumer1 (0%)—
critical minerals—1 (0%)
cryptocurrencies1 (0%)—
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)226 (15%)17 (1%)
five Goldman Sachs-rated1 (0%)—
global food—1 (0%)
global markets34 (2%)147 (10%)
high-yield credit markets—1 (0%)
junk-rated corporate bonds—1 (0%)
private—1 (0%)
private markets—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)121 (8%)101 (7%)

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: BeInCrypto or Financial Times?▼
BeInCrypto (38.2%) and Financial Times (37.5%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do BeInCrypto and Financial Times both cover?▼
They share 19 market contexts: Asian stocks, Australian stocks, BNB, Bitcoin, Copper, DAX, European stocks, Gold, Indian stocks, Japanese stocks, NASDAQ, Oil, Silver, UK markets, USA, USD/JPY, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.