CNBCvsFinancial Times
CNBC (38.6% hit rate) vs Financial Times (37.4% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.
Neither did better against chance than the other
Based on 3868 and 3137 checked headlines
Hit rate
Checked reports
Articles Analyzed
Avg. Relevance
Sentiment & Bias Analysis
How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.
Sentiment Distribution
CNBC
Financial Times
Market Context Coverage
| Hit rate by market | CNBC | Financial Times |
|---|---|---|
| AI infrastructure bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| AST SpaceMobile | 1 (0%) | — |
| AT&T | 1 (0%) | — |
| Adobe, single software | 1 (0%) | — |
| Affirm Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Aluminum | 2 (0%) | — |
| Amazon | 4 (0%) | — |
| Apple | 2 (0%) | — |
| Argentine peso | — | 1 (0%) |
| Asian stocks | 51 (3%) | 85 (6%) |
| Australian stocks | 6 (0%) | 23 (2%) |
| Automotive industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| Autonomous driving | 1 (0%) | — |
| BNB | 1 (0%) | 3 (0%) |
| Baidu | 1 (0%) | — |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 1 (0%) | — |
| Biogen | 1 (0%) | — |
| Biotech | 1 (0%) | — |
| Bitcoin | 25 (2%) | 18 (1%) |
| Block Inc | 1 (0%) | — |
| Booking Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Brazilian | 2 (0%) | — |
| Brazilian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Brazilian real | 1 (0%) | — |
| CVS Health, healthcare/managed care | 1 (0%) | — |
| ChargePoint | 1 (0%) | — |
| China 10-year government bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| China industrial profits | 1 (0%) | — |
| China trade data | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese biopharma | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese economy | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill | 1 (0%) | — |
| Coinbase | 1 (0%) | — |
| Commodities | 1 (0%) | — |
| Copper | 3 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| CoreWeave | 4 (0%) | — |
| DAX | 7 (0%) | 10 (1%) |
| Dell Technologies | 2 (0%) | — |
| EUR/USD | 3 (0%) | 4 (0%) |
| Eli Lilly | 1 (0%) | — |
| Etsy | 1 (0%) | — |
| European natural gas | — | 1 (0%) |
| European stocks | 57 (3%) | 72 (5%) |
| Expedia Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Ferrari | 1 (0%) | — |
| Ford Motor Company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Fortinet | 1 (0%) | — |
| French bond | — | 1 (0%) |
| French government bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| GBP/USD | 1 (0%) | — |
| Generac Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Glencore | — | 1 (0%) |
| Gold | 33 (2%) | 44 (3%) |
| Hanwha Ocean | 1 (0%) | — |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 1 (0%) | — |
| Homebuilder | 1 (0%) | — |
| Hybe | 1 (0%) | — |
| Iceland EU vote | 1 (0%) | — |
| Indian stocks | 23 (1%) | 72 (5%) |
| Indonesian | — | 1 (0%) |
| Indonesian stock | — | 1 (0%) |
| Japanese stocks | 20 (1%) | 52 (4%) |
| JetBlue | 1 (0%) | — |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1 (0%) | — |
| Kazakh tenge | — | 1 (0%) |
| Korean | 1 (0%) | — |
| Lithium | 1 (0%) | — |
| Lucid Motors | 1 (0%) | — |
| Luxury sector | 2 (0%) | — |
| MGM Resorts | 1 (0%) | — |
| Madison Air IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mastercard | 1 (0%) | — |
| MaxLinear | 1 (0%) | — |
| Meta Platforms | 2 (0%) | — |
| Micron Technology | 1 (0%) | — |
| Microsoft | 1 (0%) | — |
| Municipal Bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| NASDAQ | 47 (3%) | 12 (1%) |
| Netflix | 2 (0%) | — |
| New Zealand exporters | 1 (0%) | — |
| Nike | 3 (0%) | — |
| Novo Nordisk | 2 (0%) | — |
| Nvidia | 1 (0%) | — |
| Oil | 305 (18%) | 411 (29%) |
| Oracle | 2 (0%) | — |
| Palantir | 2 (0%) | — |
| Palantir Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| Paramount/Warner Bros merger | 1 (0%) | — |
| Peloton | 1 (0%) | — |
| Penguin Solutions | 1 (0%) | — |
| PepsiCo | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pharmaceutical | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pharmaceutical ETF | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pop Mart | 1 (0%) | — |
| Private Credit | 1 (0%) | — |
| Qantas | 1 (0%) | — |
| Refiner | 1 (0%) | — |
| Restaurant Brands International | 1 (0%) | — |
| Restaurant industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| Rivian | 1 (0%) | — |
| Robinhood | 2 (0%) | — |
| Roku | 1 (0%) | — |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises | 1 (0%) | — |
| SK Hynix | 1 (0%) | — |
| Salesforce | 1 (0%) | — |
| Samsung Electronics | 1 (0%) | — |
| Saudi Aramco | 1 (0%) | — |
| Seven & i Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Sherwin-Williams | 1 (0%) | — |
| Silver | 4 (0%) | 3 (0%) |
| SoFi Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| South Korean | — | 1 (0%) |
| South Korean rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| South Korean solar | 1 (0%) | — |
| SpaceX IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Swiss Franc | 2 (0%) | — |
| Taiwan economy | 1 (0%) | — |
| Take-Two Interactive | 1 (0%) | — |
| Tapestry Inc | 1 (0%) | — |
| Target Corp | 1 (0%) | — |
| Tesla | 2 (0%) | — |
| Turkish | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| UK markets | 21 (1%) | 79 (6%) |
| US Banking Sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| US apartment rents | 1 (0%) | — |
| US banking sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| US mortgage rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| US short-term interest rates | — | 1 (0%) |
| US-China summit expectations | 1 (0%) | — |
| USA | 456 (27%) | 219 (16%) |
| USD | 2 (0%) | — |
| USD/JPY | 15 (1%) | 20 (1%) |
| Union Pacific | 1 (0%) | — |
| Utilities sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| Visa | 1 (0%) | — |
| Walmart | 1 (0%) | — |
| Wendy's | 2 (0%) | — |
| West Pharma | 1 (0%) | — |
| Xpeng | 1 (0%) | — |
| Zebra Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| biotech | 1 (0%) | — |
| bond | 1 (0%) | — |
| consumer stock/haircare sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| critical minerals | — | 1 (0%) |
| cryptocurrencies (Crypto) | 15 (1%) | 17 (1%) |
| data storage manufacturer | 1 (0%) | — |
| defense industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| global food | — | 1 (0%) |
| global markets | 134 (8%) | 146 (10%) |
| high-yield credit markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| home furnishings | 1 (0%) | — |
| junk-rated corporate bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| memory | 1 (0%) | — |
| natural gas pipeline operators | 1 (0%) | — |
| prediction markets / Robinhood | 1 (0%) | — |
| private | — | 1 (0%) |
| private markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| retail | 1 (0%) | — |
| small-cap | 1 (0%) | — |
| software stock / Salesforce | 1 (0%) | — |
| technology stocks (Tech) | 314 (19%) | 99 (7%) |
| uranium | 1 (0%) | — |
See today's news picture — not a forecast
A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.
Get Free AI Market Insights
The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.
AI-Analysed Market Trends
Browse the analysed trends for free
Your Own Dashboard
Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check
How often the news was right
Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable: CNBC or Financial Times?▼
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
What markets do CNBC and Financial Times both cover?▼
Our Methodology
AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.