Head-to-Head Comparison
Borsen DKvsDagens Industri
Borsen DK (39.5% hit rate) vs Dagens Industri (35.9% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.
Neither did better against chance than the other
Based on 501 and 2870 checked headlines
Hit rate
39.5%vs35.9%
Checked reports
501vs2,870
Articles Analyzed
328vs2,000
Avg. Relevance
-vs-
Sentiment & Bias Analysis
How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.
Sentiment Distribution
Borsen DK
Avg. Sentiment: -0.10
Bullish 38%Neutral 5%Bearish 57%
Dagens Industri
Avg. Sentiment: -0.09
Bullish 41%Neutral 5%Bearish 55%
Market Context Coverage
| Hit rate by market | Borsen DK | Dagens Industri |
|---|---|---|
| AB Volvo | — | 1 (0%) |
| ABB | — | 2 (0%) |
| ALK-Abelló | 1 (0%) | — |
| Academedia | — | 1 (0%) |
| Acroud | — | 1 (0%) |
| Airline | — | 1 (0%) |
| Alfa Laval | — | 3 (0%) |
| Alleima | — | 1 (0%) |
| Alleimaas | — | 1 (0%) |
| Alphabet | 1 (0%) | — |
| Alstom, French rail manufacturer | — | 1 (0%) |
| Amazon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Anthropic IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Anthropic valuation | — | 1 (0%) |
| Apotea | — | 1 (0%) |
| Apotea, Swedish online pharmacy | — | 1 (0%) |
| Apple | 1 (0%) | — |
| Argentine economy | — | 1 (0%) |
| Ascelia Pharma | — | 1 (0%) |
| Asian stocks | 29 (10%) | 98 (7%) |
| AstraZeneca | — | 3 (0%) |
| Atlas Copco | — | 3 (0%) |
| Atrium Ljungberg | — | 2 (0%) |
| Audi/Volkswagen | — | 1 (0%) |
| Australian stocks | — | 1 (0%) |
| Autoliv | — | 2 (0%) |
| Avensia | — | 1 (0%) |
| Axfood | — | 1 (0%) |
| BE Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bank of America | — | 1 (0%) |
| Beijer Ref | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bico | — | 1 (0%) |
| Binance | — | 1 (0%) |
| Biogaia | — | 1 (0%) |
| Biogaia, Swedish probiotics company | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bitcoin | 1 (0%) | 8 (1%) |
| Boeing | — | 2 (0%) |
| Boozt | — | 1 (0%) |
| Boozt Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Bravida | — | 1 (0%) |
| Brazilian | — | 1 (0%) |
| CTEK | — | 1 (0%) |
| Camparis | — | 1 (0%) |
| Canada-US trade negotiations | — | 1 (0%) |
| Canada-USA trade | — | 1 (0%) |
| Carlsberg | 1 (0%) | — |
| Carlsberg IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Carrefour | — | 1 (0%) |
| Catena, Swedish | — | 1 (0%) |
| Cellavision | — | 1 (0%) |
| Chinese credit | — | 1 (0%) |
| Chinese economy | — | 1 (0%) |
| Chinese financial markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Clas Ohlson | — | 3 (0%) |
| Cloetta | — | 1 (0%) |
| Coloplast | 1 (0%) | — |
| Coloplast, Danish medtech company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Commodities | 1 (0%) | — |
| Copenhagen housing | 2 (1%) | — |
| Copenhagen real estate | 1 (0%) | — |
| Copper | — | 2 (0%) |
| Crocs | — | 1 (0%) |
| DAX | 2 (1%) | 12 (1%) |
| DSV | 2 (1%) | — |
| Danish | 5 (2%) | — |
| Danish bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish defense-sector businesses | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish economy | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Danish housing | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish inflation | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish real estate | 4 (1%) | — |
| Danske Bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Demant | 2 (1%) | — |
| Dynavox | — | 1 (0%) |
| Dyrgripen | — | 1 (0%) |
| EUR/USD | 1 (0%) | 5 (0%) |
| Electrolux | — | 2 (0%) |
| Ellos | — | 1 (0%) |
| Enrad | — | 1 (0%) |
| Epiroc | — | 2 (0%) |
| Ericsson | — | 3 (0%) |
| Essity | — | 1 (0%) |
| Essitys | — | 1 (0%) |
| European natural gas | 1 (0%) | — |
| European stocks | 47 (16%) | 266 (18%) |
| Evolution AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Ferrari | — | 1 (0%) |
| Finnair | — | 1 (0%) |
| French government bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| GBP/USD | — | 1 (0%) |
| GN Store Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Genmab | 3 (1%) | — |
| Getinge | — | 1 (0%) |
| Gold | 3 (1%) | 7 (1%) |
| H&M | — | 4 (0%) |
| HMS Networks | — | 1 (0%) |
| HP | — | 1 (0%) |
| Handelsbanken, Swedish bank | — | 1 (0%) |
| Heba real estate | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hemnet | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hernö Gin | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hexagon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hexagon AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hufvudstaden AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Husqvarna | — | 1 (0%) |
| Höganäs AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| IAG/airline | — | 1 (0%) |
| IPO | — | 1 (0%) |
| ISS A/S | 1 (0%) | — |
| Indian stocks | — | 6 (0%) |
| Indonesian | — | 1 (0%) |
| Intel | — | 1 (0%) |
| Intrum | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iron ore/Commodities | — | 1 (0%) |
| JM AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Japanese stocks | 2 (1%) | 10 (1%) |
| Kinnevik | — | 3 (0%) |
| Klarna | — | 3 (0%) |
| Konecranes | — | 1 (0%) |
| LVMH | — | 1 (0%) |
| Loomis | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lululemon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lundbeck | 1 (0%) | — |
| Luxury goods sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lyko | — | 1 (0%) |
| Maersk | 1 (0%) | — |
| Maersk / Shipping | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mendole | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mercedes-Benz | — | 1 (0%) |
| Micro Systemation | — | 1 (0%) |
| Munters AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Mycronic | — | 1 (0%) |
| NASDAQ | 4 (1%) | 62 (4%) |
| Netflix | — | 1 (0%) |
| New Wave | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nibe | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nibe AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nike | 1 (0%) | — |
| Noba Bank | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nordea | — | 3 (0%) |
| Nordea Bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Norden A/S | 1 (0%) | — |
| Nordnet/Avanza | — | 1 (0%) |
| Norwegian electricity | — | 1 (0%) |
| Norwegian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Norwegian salmon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Novartis | — | 1 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk | 10 (3%) | 2 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk, Danish | 1 (0%) | — |
| Novonesis | 1 (0%) | — |
| Nscale IPO | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nvidia | — | 1 (0%) |
| Oil | 43 (15%) | 122 (8%) |
| Ortelius International | — | 1 (0%) |
| Pandora | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pandora jewelry company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pandora, Danish jewelry company | 1 (0%) | — |
| PayPal | — | 1 (0%) |
| PepsiCo | — | 1 (0%) |
| Polestar | — | 1 (0%) |
| Porsche | — | 1 (0%) |
| Qben Infra | — | 1 (0%) |
| Rejlers | — | 1 (0%) |
| Royal Unibrew | 1 (0%) | — |
| Rusta | — | 1 (0%) |
| Röko AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| SAS | 1 (0%) | — |
| SBB | — | 1 (0%) |
| SCA Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| SEB | — | 3 (0%) |
| SEK | — | 2 (0%) |
| SK Hynix | — | 2 (0%) |
| SKF AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| SSAB | — | 3 (0%) |
| Saab | — | 2 (0%) |
| Sandvik | — | 3 (0%) |
| Scandi Standards | — | 1 (0%) |
| Schenker | 1 (0%) | — |
| Schneider Electric | — | 1 (0%) |
| Sectra | — | 1 (0%) |
| Securitas AB | — | 3 (0%) |
| Silver | — | 3 (0%) |
| Sinch | — | 2 (0%) |
| Skanska | — | 1 (0%) |
| Skistar | — | 1 (0%) |
| Smart Eye AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Sobi | — | 1 (0%) |
| SpaceX | — | 1 (0%) |
| Spotify | — | 1 (0%) |
| Stillfront AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Stockholm Stock Exchange | — | 13 (1%) |
| Stockholm stock exchange | — | 1 (0%) |
| Stora Enso | — | 1 (0%) |
| Storytel | — | 3 (0%) |
| Studsvik | — | 1 (0%) |
| Sweco | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedencare | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish | — | 21 (1%) |
| Swedish Krona | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish Real Estate | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish automotive supply chain | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish betting sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish construction sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish defense | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish economy | — | 3 (0%) |
| Swedish electricity | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish forestry sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish fuel | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish gaming | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish golf restaurant sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish grocery retail | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish housing | — | 6 (0%) |
| Swedish individual | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish inflation | — | 2 (0%) |
| Swedish interest rates | — | 6 (0%) |
| Swedish markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish mining | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish mining equipment | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish real estate | — | 5 (0%) |
| Swedish rental housing | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish sawmill industry | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swedish stock | — | 4 (0%) |
| Swedish venture capital | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swiss | — | 1 (0%) |
| Taiwan stock | — | 1 (0%) |
| Take-Two Interactive | 1 (0%) | — |
| Tech | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tele2 | — | 1 (0%) |
| Teqnion | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tesla | — | 1 (0%) |
| Thule | — | 1 (0%) |
| Thule AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tieto AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Traton | — | 2 (0%) |
| Traton AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Traton/Scania | — | 1 (0%) |
| Trelleborg | — | 2 (0%) |
| Troax | — | 1 (0%) |
| Truecaller | — | 2 (0%) |
| Turkish | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tången | — | 1 (0%) |
| UK markets | 3 (1%) | 25 (2%) |
| US pharmaceutical sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| US-Canada trade | — | 1 (0%) |
| USA | 34 (12%) | 330 (22%) |
| USD/JPY | 1 (0%) | 7 (1%) |
| Verisure | — | 1 (0%) |
| Volvo Cars | 1 (0%) | 7 (1%) |
| Wendy's | — | 1 (0%) |
| Wisa | — | 1 (0%) |
| Xspray | — | 1 (0%) |
| airline ticket | — | 1 (0%) |
| aviation manufacturers | — | 1 (0%) |
| bank | — | 1 (0%) |
| bank lending rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| cryptocurrencies (Crypto) | — | 2 (0%) |
| food | — | 2 (0%) |
| gaming company | — | 1 (0%) |
| global markets | 28 (10%) | 57 (4%) |
| hotel | — | 1 (0%) |
| insurance sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| interest-rate expectations | — | 1 (0%) |
| iron ore | — | 1 (0%) |
| mine equipment suppliers | 1 (0%) | — |
| mining company | — | 1 (0%) |
| professional services | 1 (0%) | — |
| technology stocks (Tech) | 24 (8%) | 145 (10%) |
| unnamed Swedish high-dividend | — | 1 (0%) |
| unnamed company | — | 1 (0%) |
| video game | 1 (0%) | — |
See today's news picture — not a forecast
A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.
Get Free AI Market Insights
The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.
AI-Analysed Market Trends
Browse the analysed trends for free
Your Own Dashboard
Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check
How often the news was right
Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable: Borsen DK or Dagens Industri?▼
Borsen DK (39.5%) and Dagens Industri (35.9%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do Borsen DK and Dagens Industri both cover?▼
They share 17 market contexts: Asian stocks, Bitcoin, DAX, Danish economy, EUR/USD, European stocks, Gold, Japanese stocks, NASDAQ, Novo Nordisk, Oil, UK markets, USA, USD/JPY, Volvo Cars, global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.
Our Methodology
AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.