AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

Investors Business Dailyvswallstreet-online Nachrichten

Investors Business Daily (37.0% hit rate) vs wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 600 and 1181 checked headlines

Investors Business Daily

Ranked #5 of — sources

Metric
wallstreet-online Nachrichten

Ranked #13 of — sources

Hit rate

37.0%vs36.8%

Checked reports

600vs1,181

Articles Analyzed

405vs651

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

Investors Business Daily

Avg. Sentiment: 0.01
Bullish 52%Neutral 2%Bearish 45%

wallstreet-online Nachrichten

Avg. Sentiment: 0.00
Bullish 47%Neutral 3%Bearish 50%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketInvestors Business Dailywallstreet-online Nachrichten
AMD1 (0%)—
ASOS—1 (0%)
AT&S—1 (0%)
AT&T—1 (0%)
AXA—1 (0%)
Accenture1 (0%)—
Adobe1 (0%)1 (0%)
Airbus—2 (0%)
Aixtron—1 (0%)
Alibaba—3 (1%)
Alibaba/Chinese Tech—1 (0%)
Allianz—2 (0%)
Alphabet—1 (0%)
Amazon—2 (0%)
American Express—1 (0%)
Anthropic IPO1 (0%)—
AppLovin—1 (0%)
Apple1 (0%)3 (1%)
Argenx1 (0%)—
Asian stocks—3 (1%)
Australian stocks—3 (1%)
Auto1 Group—1 (0%)
Aviation/Transport—1 (0%)
BMW—1 (0%)
BNB—1 (0%)
BYD—3 (1%)
Bank—1 (0%)
Bayer—1 (0%)
BioNTech—2 (0%)
Biogen—1 (0%)
Biohaven1 (0%)—
Biotech2 (1%)1 (0%)
Bitcoin11 (3%)21 (3%)
BlackRock—1 (0%)
Bloom Energy1 (0%)—
Boeing2 (1%)—
Brazilian—1 (0%)
Brazilian Real—2 (0%)
Bulgarian—1 (0%)
Canadian markets—1 (0%)
Cannabis—2 (0%)
Carrefour—1 (0%)
Chinese Robotics1 (0%)—
Chinese solar sector—1 (0%)
Cisco1 (0%)—
Clear Secure, a single1 (0%)—
Coca-Cola—1 (0%)
Coinbase2 (1%)—
Commodities—1 (0%)
Copper—2 (0%)
CrowdStrike1 (0%)—
D-Wave—1 (0%)
DAX3 (1%)54 (8%)
DHL Group—1 (0%)
Daimler Truck—1 (0%)
Dell Technologies1 (0%)1 (0%)
Deutsche Bank—2 (0%)
Deutsche Telekom—3 (1%)
DoorDash2 (1%)—
DraftKings1 (0%)—
EUR/USD—4 (1%)
Eli Lilly1 (0%)—
EssilorLuxottica—1 (0%)
Estée Lauder—1 (0%)
Ethereum—1 (0%)
European natural gas—1 (0%)
European stocks2 (1%)40 (6%)
Evotec—1 (0%)
Faeth Therapeutics1 (0%)—
Fortinet—1 (0%)
French government bonds—2 (0%)
GE Vernova1 (0%)—
General Motors—1 (0%)
Gold2 (1%)28 (4%)
Grail Inc1 (0%)—
HP—1 (0%)
HPE1 (0%)—
Hapag-Lloyd—1 (0%)
Harmony Biosciences1 (0%)—
HelloFresh—1 (0%)
Hensoldt AG—1 (0%)
Honda—1 (0%)
Honeywell Aerospace—1 (0%)
Hospital1 (0%)—
Hungarian markets—1 (0%)
IBM—1 (0%)
IMAX—1 (0%)
Iambic Therapeutics—1 (0%)
Indian stocks—3 (1%)
Intuit1 (0%)—
Intuitive Surgical1 (0%)—
IonQ—1 (0%)
Ionis Pharma1 (0%)—
Iranian Rial—1 (0%)
Jakarta Stock Exchange—1 (0%)
Japanese stocks—2 (0%)
Junk Bond ETF1 (0%)—
Kraft Heinz—1 (0%)
Kupfermarkt—1 (0%)
Leonardo—1 (0%)
Lithium—1 (0%)
Lockheed Martin1 (0%)2 (0%)
Lufthansa stock, aviation sector—1 (0%)
Medtronic1 (0%)—
Mensch und Maschine—1 (0%)
Meta Platforms—2 (0%)
Micron—1 (0%)
Micron Technology1 (0%)—
Microsoft1 (0%)—
MiniMax—1 (0%)
Moderna1 (0%)1 (0%)
NASDAQ25 (7%)16 (3%)
Nanexa—1 (0%)
Natural Gas1 (0%)—
Nebius Group—2 (0%)
NetApp—1 (0%)
Netflix5 (1%)2 (0%)
NextDC—1 (0%)
Nike—2 (0%)
Nordex—1 (0%)
Nordex AG—1 (0%)
Nordson Corp1 (0%)—
Novo Nordisk—2 (0%)
Novo Nordisk, pharmaceutical—1 (0%)
Nscale IPO—1 (0%)
Nvidia1 (0%)—
Oil14 (4%)96 (15%)
Okta / cybersecurity1 (0%)—
Opera Software1 (0%)—
Oracle1 (0%)2 (0%)
Palantir—1 (0%)
Palantir stock, analyst rating—1 (0%)
Palfinger—2 (0%)
Palo Alto Networks1 (0%)1 (0%)
PayPal2 (1%)2 (0%)
Pfizer1 (0%)—
Procter & Gamble—2 (0%)
Puma SE—1 (0%)
RWE—1 (0%)
Redcare Pharmacy—1 (0%)
Renk AG—2 (0%)
Retail1 (0%)—
Rheinmetall—1 (0%)
Rheinmetall / defense technology—1 (0%)
Rivian stock, EV maker—1 (0%)
Robinhood5 (1%)—
Rocket Lab2 (1%)—
Rubrik1 (0%)—
SAP—1 (0%)
SK Hynix—1 (0%)
Saab AB—1 (0%)
Salesforce—1 (0%)
Salzgitter AG—1 (0%)
Samsara1 (0%)—
Samsung Electronics—2 (0%)
Sandisk—1 (0%)
Sartorius—1 (0%)
Seagate Technology1 (0%)—
Semtech1 (0%)—
SentinelOne1 (0%)—
SharkNinja1 (0%)—
Shopify-related e-commerce software—1 (0%)
Siemens—1 (0%)
Siemens AG—1 (0%)
Siemens Energy—3 (1%)
Silver—11 (2%)
SoFi Technologies1 (0%)—
SoftBank—1 (0%)
South Korean—1 (0%)
South Korean solar—1 (0%)
Space sector—1 (0%)
SpaceX2 (1%)1 (0%)
Swiss Franc—1 (0%)
Take-Two Interactive—2 (0%)
Target—1 (0%)
Target Corporation1 (0%)—
Technip Energies—1 (0%)
Telecom1 (0%)—
Tesla10 (3%)3 (1%)
Teva Pharma1 (0%)—
Thyssenkrupp—1 (0%)
UK markets—3 (1%)
US Real Estate—1 (0%)
US Soybean—1 (0%)
USA114 (31%)57 (9%)
USD/JPY—1 (0%)
Uber1 (0%)—
Uber Technologies, ride-hailing—1 (0%)
UniQure1 (0%)—
Union Pacific—1 (0%)
Uranium—1 (0%)
Vera1 (0%)—
Verbio AG—1 (0%)
Verizon—1 (0%)
Vertiv—1 (0%)
Vestas Wind Systems—1 (0%)
Viatris1 (0%)—
Victoria's Secret1 (0%)—
Vincorion—1 (0%)
Vonovia—2 (0%)
Workday1 (0%)—
XRP—5 (1%)
Xiaomi—1 (0%)
Xpeng—1 (0%)
Zinc—2 (0%)
Zoom1 (0%)—
cell tower operator1 (0%)—
consumer finance1 (0%)—
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)4 (1%)7 (1%)
general—1 (0%)
global markets4 (1%)15 (2%)
hard drive1 (0%)—
online retail / e-commerce—1 (0%)
quantum computing1 (0%)—
restaurant—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)96 (26%)98 (15%)
uranium1 (0%)—
used car1 (0%)—

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: Investors Business Daily or wallstreet-online Nachrichten?▼
Investors Business Daily (37.0%) and wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do Investors Business Daily and wallstreet-online Nachrichten both cover?▼
They share 22 market contexts: Adobe, Apple, Biotech, Bitcoin, DAX, Dell Technologies, European stocks, Gold, Lockheed Martin, Moderna, NASDAQ, Netflix, Oil, Oracle, Palo Alto Networks, PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, USA, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.