AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

CNBC TechnologyvsCNBC

CNBC Technology (43.0% hit rate) vs CNBC (38.6% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 600 and 3910 checked headlines

CNBC Technology

Ranked #1 of — sources

Metric
CNBC

Ranked #3 of — sources

Hit rate

43.0%vs38.6%

Checked reports

600vs3,910

Articles Analyzed

338vs1,937

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

CNBC Technology

Avg. Sentiment: 0.02
Bullish 50%Neutral 3%Bearish 48%

CNBC

Avg. Sentiment: 0.02
Bullish 51%Neutral 5%Bearish 45%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketCNBC TechnologyCNBC
AI infrastructure firms1 (0%)—
AST SpaceMobile—1 (0%)
AT&T—1 (0%)
Accelevation Holdings1 (0%)—
Adobe, single software—1 (0%)
Affirm1 (0%)—
Affirm Holdings—1 (0%)
Airline—1 (0%)
Aluminum—2 (0%)
Amazon—4 (0%)
Apple—2 (0%)
Asian stocks7 (2%)51 (3%)
Australian stocks2 (1%)6 (0%)
Automotive industry—1 (0%)
Autonomous driving—1 (0%)
Aviation/eVTOL1 (0%)—
BNB2 (1%)1 (0%)
Baidu—1 (0%)
Berkshire Hathaway—1 (0%)
Biogen—1 (0%)
Biotech—1 (0%)
Bitcoin8 (3%)25 (2%)
Block Inc—1 (0%)
Booking Holdings—1 (0%)
Brazilian—2 (0%)
Brazilian real—1 (0%)
CVS Health, healthcare/managed care—1 (0%)
ChargePoint—1 (0%)
China industrial profits—1 (0%)
China trade data—1 (0%)
Chinese biopharma—1 (0%)
Chinese economy—1 (0%)
Chipotle Mexican Grill—1 (0%)
Circle1 (0%)—
Coinbase—1 (0%)
Commodities—1 (0%)
Copper—3 (0%)
CoreWeave—4 (0%)
DAX—7 (0%)
Dell Technologies—2 (0%)
EUR/USD—3 (0%)
Eli Lilly—1 (0%)
Etsy—1 (0%)
European stocks1 (0%)57 (3%)
Eutelsat1 (0%)—
Expedia Group—1 (0%)
Ferrari—1 (0%)
Ford Motor Company—1 (0%)
Fortinet—1 (0%)
French government bonds—1 (0%)
GBP/USD—1 (0%)
Generac Holdings—1 (0%)
Gold—34 (2%)
Hanwha Ocean—1 (0%)
Hewlett Packard Enterprise—1 (0%)
Homebuilder—1 (0%)
Humanoid Robots1 (0%)—
Hybe—1 (0%)
IBM1 (0%)—
Iceland EU vote—1 (0%)
Indian stocks—23 (1%)
Intel1 (0%)—
Japanese stocks3 (1%)20 (1%)
JetBlue—1 (0%)
Johnson & Johnson—1 (0%)
Korean—1 (0%)
Lithium—1 (0%)
Lucid Motors—1 (0%)
Luxury sector—2 (0%)
MGM Resorts—1 (0%)
Madison Air IPO—1 (0%)
Mastercard—1 (0%)
MaxLinear—1 (0%)
Meta Platforms—2 (0%)
Micron Technology—1 (0%)
Microsoft1 (0%)1 (0%)
Municipal Bonds—1 (0%)
NASDAQ14 (5%)48 (3%)
Netflix—2 (0%)
New Zealand exporters—1 (0%)
Nike—3 (0%)
Novo Nordisk—2 (0%)
Nvidia3 (1%)1 (0%)
Nvidia corporate governance1 (0%)—
Oil—306 (18%)
Oracle—2 (0%)
Palantir—2 (0%)
Palantir Technologies—1 (0%)
Paramount/Warner Bros merger—1 (0%)
Peloton—1 (0%)
Penguin Solutions—1 (0%)
PepsiCo—1 (0%)
Pharmaceutical—1 (0%)
Pharmaceutical ETF—1 (0%)
Pinterest1 (0%)—
Pop Mart—1 (0%)
Private Credit—1 (0%)
Qantas—1 (0%)
Reddit2 (1%)—
Refiner—1 (0%)
Restaurant Brands International—1 (0%)
Restaurant industry—1 (0%)
Riot Platforms—1 (0%)
Rivian—2 (0%)
Robinhood1 (0%)2 (0%)
Roku—1 (0%)
Royal Caribbean Cruises—1 (0%)
SK Hynix1 (0%)1 (0%)
Salesforce1 (0%)1 (0%)
Samsung Electronics—1 (0%)
Saudi Aramco—1 (0%)
Seven & i Holdings—1 (0%)
Shein IPO1 (0%)—
Sherwin-Williams—1 (0%)
Silver—4 (0%)
Snap Inc1 (0%)—
SoFi Technologies—1 (0%)
South Korean defense1 (0%)—
South Korean rates—1 (0%)
South Korean solar—1 (0%)
SpaceX IPO—1 (0%)
Swiss Franc—2 (0%)
Taiwan economy—1 (0%)
Take-Two Interactive—1 (0%)
Tapestry Inc—1 (0%)
Target Corp—1 (0%)
Tech1 (0%)—
Tesla—2 (0%)
Turkish—1 (0%)
UK markets1 (0%)21 (1%)
US Banking Sector—1 (0%)
US apartment rents—1 (0%)
US mortgage rates—1 (0%)
US-China summit expectations—1 (0%)
USA21 (7%)462 (27%)
USD—2 (0%)
USD/JPY—15 (1%)
Ubisoft1 (0%)—
Union Pacific—1 (0%)
Utilities sector—1 (0%)
Visa—1 (0%)
Walmart—1 (0%)
Wendy's—2 (0%)
West Pharma—1 (0%)
Xpeng—1 (0%)
Zebra Technologies—1 (0%)
biotech—1 (0%)
bond—1 (0%)
consumer1 (0%)—
consumer stock/haircare sector—1 (0%)
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)8 (3%)15 (1%)
data storage manufacturer—1 (0%)
defense industry—1 (0%)
global markets3 (1%)136 (8%)
government bond yields1 (0%)—
home furnishings—1 (0%)
memory—1 (0%)
natural gas pipeline operators—1 (0%)
prediction markets / Robinhood—1 (0%)
retail—1 (0%)
small-cap—1 (0%)
smartphone1 (0%)—
software stock / Salesforce—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)205 (68%)315 (19%)
uranium—1 (0%)

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: CNBC Technology or CNBC?▼
CNBC Technology (43.0%) and CNBC (38.6%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do CNBC Technology and CNBC both cover?▼
They share 17 market contexts: Asian stocks, Australian stocks, BNB, Bitcoin, European stocks, Japanese stocks, Microsoft, NASDAQ, Nvidia, Robinhood, SK Hynix, Salesforce, UK markets, USA, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.