AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

Bitcoin Magazinevswallstreet-online Nachrichten

Bitcoin Magazine (33.8% hit rate) vs wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 432 and 1181 checked headlines

Bitcoin Magazine

Ranked #18 of — sources

Metric
wallstreet-online Nachrichten

Ranked #13 of — sources

Hit rate

33.8%vs36.8%

Checked reports

432vs1,181

Articles Analyzed

248vs651

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

Bitcoin Magazine

Avg. Sentiment: 0.17
Bullish 64%Neutral 3%Bearish 33%

wallstreet-online Nachrichten

Avg. Sentiment: 0.00
Bullish 47%Neutral 3%Bearish 50%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketBitcoin Magazinewallstreet-online Nachrichten
ASOS—1 (0%)
AT&S—1 (0%)
AT&T—1 (0%)
AXA—1 (0%)
Adobe—1 (0%)
Airbus—2 (0%)
Aixtron—1 (0%)
Alibaba—3 (1%)
Alibaba/Chinese Tech—1 (0%)
Allianz—2 (0%)
Alphabet—1 (0%)
Amazon—2 (0%)
American Express—1 (0%)
AppLovin—1 (0%)
Apple—3 (1%)
Asian stocks—3 (1%)
Australian stocks1 (0%)3 (1%)
Auto1 Group—1 (0%)
Aviation/Transport—1 (0%)
BMW—1 (0%)
BNB—1 (0%)
BYD—3 (1%)
Bank—1 (0%)
Bayer—1 (0%)
BioNTech—2 (0%)
Biogen—1 (0%)
Biotech—1 (0%)
Bitcoin213 (87%)21 (3%)
BlackRock—1 (0%)
Brazilian—1 (0%)
Brazilian Real—2 (0%)
Bulgarian—1 (0%)
Canadian markets—1 (0%)
Cannabis—2 (0%)
Carrefour—1 (0%)
Chinese solar sector—1 (0%)
Coca-Cola—1 (0%)
Commodities—1 (0%)
Copper—2 (0%)
D-Wave—1 (0%)
DAX—54 (8%)
DHL Group—1 (0%)
Daimler Truck—1 (0%)
Dell Technologies—1 (0%)
Deutsche Bank—2 (0%)
Deutsche Telekom—3 (1%)
EUR/USD—4 (1%)
EssilorLuxottica—1 (0%)
Estée Lauder—1 (0%)
Ethereum—1 (0%)
European natural gas—1 (0%)
European stocks—40 (6%)
Evotec—1 (0%)
Fortinet—1 (0%)
French government bonds—2 (0%)
General Motors—1 (0%)
Gold1 (0%)28 (4%)
HP—1 (0%)
Hapag-Lloyd—1 (0%)
HelloFresh—1 (0%)
Hensoldt AG—1 (0%)
Honda—1 (0%)
Honeywell Aerospace—1 (0%)
Hungarian markets—1 (0%)
IBM—1 (0%)
IMAX—1 (0%)
Iambic Therapeutics—1 (0%)
Indian stocks—3 (1%)
IonQ—1 (0%)
Iranian Rial—1 (0%)
Jakarta Stock Exchange—1 (0%)
Japanese stocks1 (0%)2 (0%)
Kraft Heinz—1 (0%)
Kupfermarkt—1 (0%)
Leonardo—1 (0%)
Lithium—1 (0%)
Lockheed Martin—2 (0%)
Lufthansa stock, aviation sector—1 (0%)
Mensch und Maschine—1 (0%)
Meta Platforms—2 (0%)
Micron—1 (0%)
MiniMax—1 (0%)
Moderna—1 (0%)
NASDAQ1 (0%)16 (3%)
Nanexa—1 (0%)
Nebius Group—2 (0%)
NetApp—1 (0%)
Netflix—2 (0%)
NextDC—1 (0%)
Nike—2 (0%)
Nordex—1 (0%)
Nordex AG—1 (0%)
Novo Nordisk—2 (0%)
Novo Nordisk, pharmaceutical—1 (0%)
Nscale IPO—1 (0%)
Oil1 (0%)96 (15%)
Oracle—2 (0%)
Palantir—1 (0%)
Palantir stock, analyst rating—1 (0%)
Palfinger—2 (0%)
Palo Alto Networks—1 (0%)
PayPal—2 (0%)
Procter & Gamble—2 (0%)
Puma SE—1 (0%)
RWE—1 (0%)
Redcare Pharmacy—1 (0%)
Renk AG—2 (0%)
Rheinmetall—1 (0%)
Rheinmetall / defense technology—1 (0%)
Rivian stock, EV maker—1 (0%)
SAP—1 (0%)
SK Hynix—1 (0%)
Saab AB—1 (0%)
Salesforce—1 (0%)
Salzgitter AG—1 (0%)
Samsung Electronics—2 (0%)
Sandisk—1 (0%)
Sartorius—1 (0%)
Shopify-related e-commerce software—1 (0%)
Siemens—1 (0%)
Siemens AG—1 (0%)
Siemens Energy—3 (1%)
Silver—11 (2%)
SoftBank—1 (0%)
South Korean—1 (0%)
South Korean solar—1 (0%)
Space sector—1 (0%)
SpaceX—1 (0%)
Stablecoins1 (0%)—
Swiss Franc—1 (0%)
Take-Two Interactive—2 (0%)
Target—1 (0%)
Technip Energies—1 (0%)
Tesla—3 (1%)
Thyssenkrupp—1 (0%)
UK markets—3 (1%)
US Real Estate—1 (0%)
US Soybean—1 (0%)
USA—57 (9%)
USD/JPY—1 (0%)
Uber Technologies, ride-hailing—1 (0%)
Union Pacific—1 (0%)
Uranium—1 (0%)
Verbio AG—1 (0%)
Verizon—1 (0%)
Vertiv—1 (0%)
Vestas Wind Systems—1 (0%)
Vincorion—1 (0%)
Vonovia—2 (0%)
XRP—5 (1%)
Xiaomi—1 (0%)
Xpeng—1 (0%)
Zinc—2 (0%)
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)27 (11%)7 (1%)
general—1 (0%)
global markets—15 (2%)
online retail / e-commerce—1 (0%)
restaurant—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)—98 (15%)

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: Bitcoin Magazine or wallstreet-online Nachrichten?▼
Bitcoin Magazine (33.8%) and wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do Bitcoin Magazine and wallstreet-online Nachrichten both cover?▼
They share 7 market contexts: Australian stocks, Bitcoin, Gold, Japanese stocks, NASDAQ, Oil, cryptocurrencies (Crypto). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.