Borsen DKvsFinancial Times
Borsen DK (39.5% hit rate) vs Financial Times (37.5% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.
Neither did better against chance than the other
Based on 509 and 3149 checked headlines
Hit rate
Checked reports
Articles Analyzed
Avg. Relevance
Sentiment & Bias Analysis
How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.
Sentiment Distribution
Borsen DK
Financial Times
Market Context Coverage
| Hit rate by market | Borsen DK | Financial Times |
|---|---|---|
| AI infrastructure bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| ALK-Abelló | 1 (0%) | — |
| Alphabet | 1 (0%) | — |
| Anthropic IPO | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Apple | 1 (0%) | — |
| Argentine peso | — | 1 (0%) |
| Asian stocks | 29 (10%) | 85 (6%) |
| Australian stocks | — | 23 (2%) |
| BNB | — | 3 (0%) |
| Bitcoin | 1 (0%) | 18 (1%) |
| Boozt Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Brazilian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Carlsberg | 1 (0%) | — |
| Carlsberg IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| China 10-year government bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| Coloplast | 1 (0%) | — |
| Coloplast, Danish medtech company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Commodities | 1 (0%) | — |
| Copenhagen housing | 2 (1%) | — |
| Copenhagen real estate | 1 (0%) | — |
| Copper | — | 2 (0%) |
| DAX | 3 (1%) | 10 (1%) |
| DSV | 2 (1%) | — |
| Danish | 5 (2%) | — |
| Danish bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish defense-sector businesses | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish economy | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish housing | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish inflation | 1 (0%) | — |
| Danish real estate | 4 (1%) | — |
| Danske Bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Demant | 2 (1%) | — |
| EUR/USD | 1 (0%) | 4 (0%) |
| European natural gas | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| European stocks | 47 (16%) | 72 (5%) |
| FLSmidth mining equipment company | 1 (0%) | — |
| French bond | — | 1 (0%) |
| GN Store Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Genmab | 3 (1%) | — |
| Glencore | — | 1 (0%) |
| Gold | 3 (1%) | 44 (3%) |
| ISS A/S | 1 (0%) | — |
| Indian stocks | — | 72 (5%) |
| Indonesian | — | 1 (0%) |
| Indonesian stock | — | 1 (0%) |
| Japanese stocks | 2 (1%) | 52 (4%) |
| Kazakh tenge | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lundbeck | 1 (0%) | — |
| Maersk | 1 (0%) | — |
| Maersk / Shipping | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mendole | 1 (0%) | — |
| NASDAQ | 4 (1%) | 12 (1%) |
| Nike | 1 (0%) | — |
| Nordea Bank | 1 (0%) | — |
| Norden A/S | 1 (0%) | — |
| Novo Nordisk | 10 (3%) | — |
| Novo Nordisk, Danish | 1 (0%) | — |
| Novonesis | 1 (0%) | — |
| Oil | 43 (15%) | 411 (29%) |
| Pandora | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pandora jewelry company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pandora, Danish jewelry company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Royal Unibrew | 1 (0%) | — |
| SAS | 1 (0%) | — |
| Schenker | 1 (0%) | — |
| Silver | — | 3 (0%) |
| South Korean | — | 1 (0%) |
| Take-Two Interactive | 1 (0%) | — |
| Turkish | — | 1 (0%) |
| UK markets | 3 (1%) | 79 (6%) |
| US banking sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| US pharmaceutical sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| US short-term interest rates | — | 1 (0%) |
| USA | 36 (12%) | 221 (16%) |
| USD/JPY | 1 (0%) | 20 (1%) |
| Volvo Cars | 1 (0%) | — |
| bank lending rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| critical minerals | — | 1 (0%) |
| cryptocurrencies (Crypto) | — | 17 (1%) |
| global food | — | 1 (0%) |
| global markets | 28 (9%) | 147 (10%) |
| high-yield credit markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| insurance sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| junk-rated corporate bonds | — | 1 (0%) |
| mine equipment suppliers | 1 (0%) | — |
| private | — | 1 (0%) |
| private markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| professional services | 1 (0%) | — |
| technology stocks (Tech) | 24 (8%) | 101 (7%) |
| video game | 1 (0%) | — |
See today's news picture — not a forecast
A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.
Get Free AI Market Insights
The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.
AI-Analysed Market Trends
Browse the analysed trends for free
Your Own Dashboard
Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check
How often the news was right
Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable: Borsen DK or Financial Times?▼
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
What markets do Borsen DK and Financial Times both cover?▼
Our Methodology
AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.