How Often Is Bitcoin Magazine Right?
Bitcoin Magazine: 34.1% hit rate over 428 checks, against 38.5% by chance for the same calls in the same markets. Verdict: Not distinguishable from chance.
34.1 %
Hit rate
38.5 %
Chance
-4.4 pts
Vs. chance
428
Checked reports
The record by horizon
The interval is the range the edge would most likely fall in if the measurement were repeated (95 %). The verdict already corrects for testing many sources at once (Holm correction): one interval missing zero does not by itself make that source distinguishable from chance.
| Horizon | Checked reports | Days | Hit rate | Chance | Vs. chance (95 % interval) | Detectable from | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All horizons | 428 | 94 | 34.1% | 38.5% | −4.4 pts(−11.1 to +2.2) | ±9.5 pts | Not distinguishable from chance |
| 1 d | 145 | 94 | — | — | — | — | Too few data |
| 3 d | 143 | 92 | — | — | — | — | Too few data |
| 7 d | 140 | 90 | — | — | — | — | Too few data |
Method source-record-v2, registered and never edited. Read the method. Are you a named source and think a number is wrong, or want to reply? Write to info@aiamond.com; corrections are listed in the change log.
About Bitcoin Magazine
Bitcoin Magazine: Crypto editorial, English. AIamond has analysed 237 of its articles; they gave 428 checks from the first tradable price (each article is checked at up to three horizons).
Recent reports
| Title | Hit rate by market | Trend | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Scientific (CORZ) to Exit Bitcoin Mining by Year-End as Colocation Hits $215 Million | Bitcoin | ||
| TD Cowen: Democratic Sweep Makes a Crypto-Backed CLARITY Act ‘Impossible’ | Bitcoin | ||
| TD Cowen: Democratic Sweep Makes a Crypto-Backed CLARITY Act ‘Impossible’ | Bitcoin | ||
| Adam Back: Pension Funds Are Bitcoin’s “Third Wave” of Adoption | Bitcoin | ||
| Adam Back: Pension Funds Are Bitcoin’s “Third Wave” of Adoption | Bitcoin | ||
| Bitwise’s André Dragosch: Bitcoin’s “Fair Value” of $197,000 | Bitcoin | ||
| Bitwise’s André Dragosch: Bitcoin’s “Fair Value” of $197,000 | Bitcoin | ||
| Billionaire Investor Tim Draper: “Irresponsible” for Apple & Meta NOT to Hold BTC | Bitcoin | ||
| Billionaire Investor Tim Draper: “Irresponsible” for Apple & Meta NOT to Hold BTC | Bitcoin | ||
| Billionaire Investor Tim Draper: “Irresponsible” for Apple & Meta NOT to Hold BTC | Bitcoin |
See today's news picture — not a forecast
A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.
Get Free AI Market Insights
The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.
AI-Analysed Market Trends
Browse the analysed trends for free
Your Own Dashboard
Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check
How often the news was right
Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance
Frequently Asked Questions
How does AIamond measure source reliability?▼
Can you rely on Bitcoin Magazine to call the market?▼
How many news sources does AIamond track?▼
How often is the reliability data updated?▼
Our Methodology
AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.