AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

BeInCryptovsDagens Industri

BeInCrypto (38.2% hit rate) vs Dagens Industri (35.8% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 3020 and 2891 checked headlines

BeInCrypto

Ranked #8 of — sources

Metric
Dagens Industri

Ranked #7 of — sources

Hit rate

38.2%vs35.8%

Checked reports

3,020vs2,891

Articles Analyzed

1,553vs2,010

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

BeInCrypto

Avg. Sentiment: -0.12
Bullish 39%Neutral 4%Bearish 57%

Dagens Industri

Avg. Sentiment: -0.09
Bullish 41%Neutral 5%Bearish 54%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketBeInCryptoDagens Industri
AB Volvo—1 (0%)
ABB—2 (0%)
AMC/Robinhood tokenized1 (0%)—
ARKM Token1 (0%)—
Academedia—1 (0%)
Acroud—1 (0%)
Airline—1 (0%)
Alfa Laval—3 (0%)
Alleima—1 (0%)
Alleimaas—1 (0%)
Alphabet1 (0%)—
Alstom, French rail manufacturer—1 (0%)
Amazon1 (0%)1 (0%)
Anthropic valuation—1 (0%)
Apotea—1 (0%)
Apotea, Swedish online pharmacy—1 (0%)
Apple1 (0%)—
Arbitrum1 (0%)—
Argentine Peso1 (0%)—
Argentine economy—1 (0%)
Ascelia Pharma—1 (0%)
Asian stocks20 (1%)98 (7%)
AstraZeneca—3 (0%)
Atlas Copco—3 (0%)
Atrium Ljungberg—2 (0%)
Audi/Volkswagen—1 (0%)
Australian stocks3 (0%)1 (0%)
Autoliv—2 (0%)
Avalanche1 (0%)—
Avensia—1 (0%)
Axfood—1 (0%)
BE Group—1 (0%)
BLUR Token1 (0%)—
BNB3 (0%)—
Balancer1 (0%)—
Bank of America—1 (0%)
Banking & Stablecoins1 (0%)—
Beijer Ref—1 (0%)
Berkshire Hathaway1 (0%)—
Bico—1 (0%)
Binance—1 (0%)
Biogaia—1 (0%)
Biogaia, Swedish probiotics company—1 (0%)
Bitcoin441 (30%)8 (1%)
Boeing—2 (0%)
Boozt—1 (0%)
Bravida—1 (0%)
Brazilian—1 (0%)
Broadcom1 (0%)—
CTEK—1 (0%)
Camparis—1 (0%)
Canada-US trade negotiations—1 (0%)
Canada-USA trade—1 (0%)
Cardano26 (2%)—
Carrefour—1 (0%)
Catena, Swedish—1 (0%)
Cellavision—1 (0%)
Chinese credit—1 (0%)
Chinese economy—1 (0%)
Chinese financial markets—1 (0%)
Circle1 (0%)—
Circle Arc blockchain1 (0%)—
Clas Ohlson—3 (0%)
Cloetta—1 (0%)
Coinbase1 (0%)—
Commodities vs1 (0%)—
Copper2 (0%)2 (0%)
CoreWeave1 (0%)—
Crocs1 (0%)1 (0%)
DAX1 (0%)12 (1%)
Danish economy—1 (0%)
Dell Technologies2 (0%)—
Dogecoin1 (0%)—
Dynavox—1 (0%)
Dyrgripen—1 (0%)
EUR/USD—5 (0%)
Electrolux—2 (0%)
Ellos—1 (0%)
Enrad—1 (0%)
Epiroc—2 (0%)
Ericsson—3 (0%)
Essity—1 (0%)
Essitys—1 (0%)
Ethereum95 (7%)—
European stocks5 (0%)267 (18%)
Evolution AB—1 (0%)
Ferrari—1 (0%)
Finnair—1 (0%)
French government bonds—1 (0%)
GBP/USD1 (0%)1 (0%)
Getinge—1 (0%)
Getty Images1 (0%)—
Gold58 (4%)7 (1%)
Goldman Sachs1 (0%)—
H&M—4 (0%)
HMS Networks—1 (0%)
HP—1 (0%)
Handelsbanken, Swedish bank—1 (0%)
Healthcare1 (0%)—
Heba real estate—1 (0%)
Hemnet—1 (0%)
Hernö Gin—1 (0%)
Hexagon—1 (0%)
Hexagon AB—1 (0%)
Hufvudstaden AB—1 (0%)
Husqvarna—1 (0%)
Hyperliquid2 (0%)—
Höganäs AB—1 (0%)
IAG/airline—1 (0%)
ICP1 (0%)—
IPO—1 (0%)
Indian stocks7 (1%)6 (0%)
Indonesian—1 (0%)
Intel—1 (0%)
Intrum—1 (0%)
Iron ore/Commodities—1 (0%)
JM AB—1 (0%)
Japanese stocks13 (1%)10 (1%)
Kinnevik—3 (0%)
Klarna—3 (0%)
Konecranes—1 (0%)
Korean1 (0%)—
Korean Tech IPO1 (0%)—
Korean Won1 (0%)—
Korean bond1 (0%)—
Korean markets1 (0%)—
LVMH—1 (0%)
Loomis—1 (0%)
Lululemon—1 (0%)
Luxury goods sector—1 (0%)
Lyko—1 (0%)
Mercedes-Benz—1 (0%)
Meta1 (0%)—
Micro Systemation—1 (0%)
MicroStrategy1 (0%)—
Microsoft1 (0%)—
Monero1 (0%)—
Munters AB—1 (0%)
Mycronic—1 (0%)
NASDAQ12 (1%)62 (4%)
Netflix1 (0%)1 (0%)
New Wave—2 (0%)
Nibe—1 (0%)
Nibe AB—1 (0%)
Nibe Industrier, Swedish—1 (0%)
Nike1 (0%)—
Noba Bank—1 (0%)
Nordea—3 (0%)
Nordnet/Avanza—1 (0%)
Norwegian electricity—1 (0%)
Norwegian markets—1 (0%)
Norwegian salmon—1 (0%)
Novartis—1 (0%)
Novo Nordisk—2 (0%)
Nscale IPO—1 (0%)
Nvidia1 (0%)1 (0%)
Oil66 (5%)123 (8%)
Ortelius International—1 (0%)
Palantir1 (0%)—
PayPal—1 (0%)
PepsiCo—1 (0%)
Polestar—1 (0%)
Polkadot1 (0%)—
Porsche—1 (0%)
Qben Infra—1 (0%)
Quant1 (0%)—
Ralph Lauren apparel1 (0%)—
Rejlers—1 (0%)
Rusta—1 (0%)
Röko AB—1 (0%)
SBB—1 (0%)
SCA Group—1 (0%)
SEB—3 (0%)
SEK—2 (0%)
SK Hynix1 (0%)2 (0%)
SKF AB—1 (0%)
SSAB—3 (0%)
Saab—2 (0%)
Salesforce1 (0%)—
Samsung Electronics1 (0%)—
Sandvik—3 (0%)
Scandi Standards—1 (0%)
Schneider Electric—1 (0%)
Sectra—1 (0%)
Securitas AB—3 (0%)
Securitize1 (0%)—
Shipping/Tanker ETFs1 (0%)—
Silver19 (1%)3 (0%)
Sinch—2 (0%)
Skanska—1 (0%)
Skistar—1 (0%)
Smart Eye AB—1 (0%)
Sobi—1 (0%)
Solana50 (3%)—
SpaceX2 (0%)1 (0%)
Spotify—1 (0%)
Starknet1 (0%)—
Stillfront AB—1 (0%)
Stockholm Stock Exchange—13 (1%)
Stockholm stock exchange—1 (0%)
Stora Enso—1 (0%)
Storytel—3 (0%)
Studsvik—1 (0%)
Sweco—1 (0%)
Swedencare—1 (0%)
Swedish—21 (1%)
Swedish Krona—1 (0%)
Swedish Real Estate—1 (0%)
Swedish automotive supply chain—1 (0%)
Swedish betting sector—1 (0%)
Swedish construction sector—1 (0%)
Swedish defense—1 (0%)
Swedish economy—3 (0%)
Swedish electricity—1 (0%)
Swedish forestry sector—1 (0%)
Swedish fuel—1 (0%)
Swedish gaming—1 (0%)
Swedish golf restaurant sector—1 (0%)
Swedish grocery retail—1 (0%)
Swedish housing—7 (1%)
Swedish individual—1 (0%)
Swedish inflation—2 (0%)
Swedish interest rates—6 (0%)
Swedish markets—1 (0%)
Swedish mining—1 (0%)
Swedish mining equipment—1 (0%)
Swedish real estate—5 (0%)
Swedish rental housing—1 (0%)
Swedish sawmill industry—1 (0%)
Swedish stock—4 (0%)
Swedish venture capital—1 (0%)
Swiss—1 (0%)
TRON1 (0%)—
Taiwan stock—1 (0%)
Tech—2 (0%)
Tele2—1 (0%)
Teqnion—1 (0%)
Tesla3 (0%)1 (0%)
Thule—1 (0%)
Thule AB—1 (0%)
Tieto AB—1 (0%)
Tokenization1 (0%)—
Traton—2 (0%)
Traton AG—1 (0%)
Traton/Scania—1 (0%)
Trelleborg—2 (0%)
Troax—1 (0%)
Tron1 (0%)—
Truecaller—2 (0%)
Turkish—1 (0%)
Tången—1 (0%)
UK markets5 (0%)25 (2%)
UNI1 (0%)—
US Dollar Index1 (0%)—
US Interest Rates1 (0%)—
US government borrowing costs1 (0%)—
US-Canada trade—1 (0%)
USA84 (6%)330 (22%)
USD/CNY1 (0%)—
USD/JPY7 (1%)7 (1%)
USDT1 (0%)—
Uniswap1 (0%)—
Verisure—1 (0%)
Volvo Cars—7 (1%)
Wendy's—1 (0%)
Wisa—1 (0%)
XRP95 (7%)—
Xspray—1 (0%)
Zcash3 (0%)—
airline ticket—1 (0%)
aviation manufacturers—1 (0%)
bank1 (0%)1 (0%)
bond yields1 (0%)—
bonds1 (0%)—
consumer1 (0%)—
cryptocurrencies1 (0%)—
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)226 (15%)2 (0%)
five Goldman Sachs-rated1 (0%)—
food—2 (0%)
gaming company—1 (0%)
global markets34 (2%)57 (4%)
hotel—1 (0%)
interest-rate expectations—1 (0%)
iron ore—1 (0%)
mining company—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)121 (8%)147 (10%)
unnamed Swedish high-dividend—1 (0%)
unnamed company—1 (0%)

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: BeInCrypto or Dagens Industri?▼
BeInCrypto (38.2%) and Dagens Industri (35.8%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do BeInCrypto and Dagens Industri both cover?▼
They share 27 market contexts: Amazon, Asian stocks, Australian stocks, Bitcoin, Copper, Crocs, DAX, European stocks, GBP/USD, Gold, Indian stocks, Japanese stocks, NASDAQ, Netflix, Nvidia, Oil, SK Hynix, Silver, SpaceX, Tesla, UK markets, USA, USD/JPY, bank, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.