Financial Timesvswallstreet-online Nachrichten
Financial Times (37.5 % de réussite) vs wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8 % de réussite) : à quelle fréquence le ton des titres de chaque source a correspondu au mouvement de prix suivant.
Aucune ne s'en sort mieux face au hasard que l'autre
Basé sur 3149 et 1181 titres vérifiés
Classé #14 sur — sources
Classé #13 sur — sources
Taux de réussite
Infos vérifiées
Articles Analysés
Pertinence Moyenne
Analyse du sentiment et des biais
Dans quelle mesure les titres de chaque source tendent à être haussiers ou baissiers.
Distribution du sentiment
Financial Times
wallstreet-online Nachrichten
Couverture des contextes de marché
| Taux de réussite par marché | Financial Times | wallstreet-online Nachrichten |
|---|---|---|
| AI infrastructure bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| ASOS | — | 1 (0%) |
| AT&S | — | 1 (0%) |
| AT&T | — | 1 (0%) |
| AXA | — | 1 (0%) |
| Adobe | — | 1 (0%) |
| Airbus | — | 2 (0%) |
| Aixtron | — | 1 (0%) |
| Alibaba | — | 3 (1%) |
| Alibaba/Chinese Tech | — | 1 (0%) |
| Allianz | — | 2 (0%) |
| Alphabet | — | 1 (0%) |
| Amazon | — | 2 (0%) |
| American Express | — | 1 (0%) |
| Anthropic IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| AppLovin | — | 1 (0%) |
| Apple | — | 3 (1%) |
| Argentine peso | 1 (0%) | — |
| Asian stocks | 85 (6%) | 3 (1%) |
| Australian stocks | 23 (2%) | 3 (1%) |
| Auto1 Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| Aviation/Transport | — | 1 (0%) |
| BMW | — | 1 (0%) |
| BNB | 3 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| BYD | — | 3 (1%) |
| Bank | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bayer | — | 1 (0%) |
| BioNTech | — | 2 (0%) |
| Biogen | — | 1 (0%) |
| Biotech | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bitcoin | 18 (1%) | 21 (3%) |
| BlackRock | — | 1 (0%) |
| Brazilian | — | 1 (0%) |
| Brazilian Real | — | 2 (0%) |
| Brazilian markets | 1 (0%) | — |
| Bulgarian | — | 1 (0%) |
| Canadian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Cannabis | — | 2 (0%) |
| Carrefour | — | 1 (0%) |
| China 10-year government bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese solar sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Coca-Cola | — | 1 (0%) |
| Commodities | — | 1 (0%) |
| Copper | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| D-Wave | — | 1 (0%) |
| DAX | 10 (1%) | 54 (8%) |
| DHL Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| Daimler Truck | — | 1 (0%) |
| Dell Technologies | — | 1 (0%) |
| Deutsche Bank | — | 2 (0%) |
| Deutsche Telekom | — | 3 (1%) |
| EUR/USD | 4 (0%) | 4 (1%) |
| EssilorLuxottica | — | 1 (0%) |
| Estée Lauder | — | 1 (0%) |
| Ethereum | — | 1 (0%) |
| European natural gas | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| European stocks | 72 (5%) | 40 (6%) |
| Evotec | — | 1 (0%) |
| Fortinet | — | 1 (0%) |
| French bond | 1 (0%) | — |
| French government bonds | — | 2 (0%) |
| General Motors | — | 1 (0%) |
| Glencore | 1 (0%) | — |
| Gold | 44 (3%) | 28 (4%) |
| HP | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hapag-Lloyd | — | 1 (0%) |
| HelloFresh | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hensoldt AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Honda | — | 1 (0%) |
| Honeywell Aerospace | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hungarian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| IBM | — | 1 (0%) |
| IMAX | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iambic Therapeutics | — | 1 (0%) |
| Indian stocks | 72 (5%) | 3 (1%) |
| Indonesian | 1 (0%) | — |
| Indonesian stock | 1 (0%) | — |
| IonQ | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iranian Rial | — | 1 (0%) |
| Jakarta Stock Exchange | — | 1 (0%) |
| Japanese stocks | 52 (4%) | 2 (0%) |
| Kazakh tenge | 1 (0%) | — |
| Kraft Heinz | — | 1 (0%) |
| Kupfermarkt | — | 1 (0%) |
| Leonardo | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lithium | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lockheed Martin | — | 2 (0%) |
| Lufthansa stock, aviation sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Mensch und Maschine | — | 1 (0%) |
| Meta Platforms | — | 2 (0%) |
| Micron | — | 1 (0%) |
| MiniMax | — | 1 (0%) |
| Moderna | — | 1 (0%) |
| NASDAQ | 12 (1%) | 16 (3%) |
| Nanexa | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nebius Group | — | 2 (0%) |
| NetApp | — | 1 (0%) |
| Netflix | — | 2 (0%) |
| NextDC | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nike | — | 2 (0%) |
| Nordex | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nordex AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk | — | 2 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk, pharmaceutical | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nscale IPO | — | 1 (0%) |
| Oil | 411 (29%) | 96 (15%) |
| Oracle | — | 2 (0%) |
| Palantir | — | 1 (0%) |
| Palantir stock, analyst rating | — | 1 (0%) |
| Palfinger | — | 2 (0%) |
| Palo Alto Networks | — | 1 (0%) |
| PayPal | — | 2 (0%) |
| Procter & Gamble | — | 2 (0%) |
| Puma SE | — | 1 (0%) |
| RWE | — | 1 (0%) |
| Redcare Pharmacy | — | 1 (0%) |
| Renk AG | — | 2 (0%) |
| Rheinmetall | — | 1 (0%) |
| Rheinmetall / defense technology | — | 1 (0%) |
| Rivian stock, EV maker | — | 1 (0%) |
| SAP | — | 1 (0%) |
| SK Hynix | — | 1 (0%) |
| Saab AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Salesforce | — | 1 (0%) |
| Salzgitter AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Samsung Electronics | — | 2 (0%) |
| Sandisk | — | 1 (0%) |
| Sartorius | — | 1 (0%) |
| Shopify-related e-commerce software | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens Energy | — | 3 (1%) |
| Silver | 3 (0%) | 11 (2%) |
| SoftBank | — | 1 (0%) |
| South Korean | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| South Korean solar | — | 1 (0%) |
| Space sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| SpaceX | — | 1 (0%) |
| Swiss Franc | — | 1 (0%) |
| Take-Two Interactive | — | 2 (0%) |
| Target | — | 1 (0%) |
| Technip Energies | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tesla | — | 3 (1%) |
| Thyssenkrupp | — | 1 (0%) |
| Turkish | 1 (0%) | — |
| UK markets | 79 (6%) | 3 (1%) |
| US Real Estate | — | 1 (0%) |
| US Soybean | — | 1 (0%) |
| US banking sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| US short-term interest rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| USA | 221 (16%) | 57 (9%) |
| USD/JPY | 20 (1%) | 1 (0%) |
| Uber Technologies, ride-hailing | — | 1 (0%) |
| Union Pacific | — | 1 (0%) |
| Uranium | — | 1 (0%) |
| Verbio AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Verizon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vertiv | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vestas Wind Systems | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vincorion | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vonovia | — | 2 (0%) |
| XRP | — | 5 (1%) |
| Xiaomi | — | 1 (0%) |
| Xpeng | — | 1 (0%) |
| Zinc | — | 2 (0%) |
| critical minerals | 1 (0%) | — |
| cryptocurrencies (Crypto) | 17 (1%) | 7 (1%) |
| general | — | 1 (0%) |
| global food | 1 (0%) | — |
| global markets | 147 (10%) | 15 (2%) |
| high-yield credit markets | 1 (0%) | — |
| junk-rated corporate bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| online retail / e-commerce | — | 1 (0%) |
| private | 1 (0%) | — |
| private markets | 1 (0%) | — |
| restaurant | — | 1 (0%) |
| technology stocks (Tech) | 101 (7%) | 98 (15%) |
La situation de l'actualité aujourd'hui — pas une prévision
Un court e-mail quotidien gratuit avec les informations de marché les plus importantes et leur orientation, sources comprises.
Obtenez des Informations de Marché IA Gratuites
Le tableau de l'actualité de vos marchés, lue par l'IA. Gratuit, sans carte bancaire.
Tendances de marché analysées par l'IA
Consultez gratuitement les tendances analysées
Votre Propre Tableau de Bord
Listes de suivi et l'image de l'actualité, quand vous le souhaitez
À quelle fréquence l'actualité a vu juste
Le taux de réussite de chaque source face au hasard
Questions Fréquemment Posées
Quelle source est la plus fiable : Financial Times ou wallstreet-online Nachrichten ?▼
Comment ces comparaisons sont-elles calculées ?▼
Quels marchés Financial Times et wallstreet-online Nachrichten couvrent-ils en commun ?▼
Notre Méthodologie
Une IA classe le ton de chaque article comme haussier, baissier ou neutre pour le marché concerné. À partir du premier cours auquel un lecteur pouvait négocier après la publication, nous vérifions le mouvement après 1, 3 et 7 jours. Le taux de réussite d'une source est comparé au hasard pour les mêmes appréciations et résultats au sein de chaque marché : couvrir des marchés calmes ou agités ne rapporte rien. Chaque écart a un intervalle à 95 % ; les vérifications proches dans le temps sont rééchantillonnées ensemble par blocs de 7 ou 14 jours, car elles partagent des mouvements de marché. Un verdict exige au moins 300 vérifications et doit tenir après correction pour le nombre de sources testées (Holm). Cela répond à « le marché a-t-il évolué ainsi ? » : un taux de réussite, pas un rendement. AIamond ne fait aucune prévision propre.