AIamond
Verdict: Not distinguishable from chance

How Often Is Handelsblatt Right?

Handelsblatt: 34.3% hit rate over 3,312 checks, against 34.7% by chance for the same calls in the same markets. Verdict: Not distinguishable from chance.

34.3 %

Hit rate

34.7 %

Chance

-0.3 pts

Vs. chance

3,312

Checked reports

The record by horizon

The interval is the range the edge would most likely fall in if the measurement were repeated (95 %). The verdict already corrects for testing many sources at once (Holm correction): one interval missing zero does not by itself make that source distinguishable from chance.

HorizonChecked reportsDaysHit rateChanceVs. chance (95 % interval)Detectable fromVerdict
All horizons3,31222834.3%34.7%−0.4 pts(−2.2 to +1.5)±2.7 ptsNot distinguishable from chance
1 d1,13122836.9%35.1%+1.7 pts(−1.4 to +4.9)±4.5 ptsNot distinguishable from chance
3 d1,09722432.3%34.4%−2.1 pts(−5.0 to +0.8)±4.2 ptsNot distinguishable from chance
7 d1,08422133.8%34.5%−0.7 pts(−4.5 to +3.1)±5.4 ptsNot distinguishable from chance

Method source-record-v2, registered and never edited. Read the method. Are you a named source and think a number is wrong, or want to reply? Write to info@aiamond.com; corrections are listed in the change log.

About Handelsblatt

Handelsblatt: Editorial news, Deutsch. AIamond has analysed 1,468 of its articles; they gave 3,312 checks from the first tradable price (each article is checked at up to three horizons).

Recent reports

TitleHit rate by marketTrendResult
Bank of England: Britische Notenbank hebt Zinsen erstmals seit drei Jahren an – auf 4,0 ProzentUK markets
Bank of England: Notenbank hebt Zinsen erstmals seit drei Jahren anUK markets
Commerzbank: Commerzbank baut Gewinn vor Übernahme durch Unicredit aus – senkt aber eine wichtige PrognoseDAX
KI: CoreWeave fällt, Amazon gewinnt: Wie die Midterms den KI-Sektor spaltentechnology stocks (Tech)
Nikkei, Yen, Hang Seng: Börsen in Asien nach US-Zwischenwahlen uneinheitlich - Technologiewerte brechen einAsian stocks
Immobilien: Kaufpreise für Wohnungen sinken erstmals seit mehr als zwei JahrenDAX
Silicon Valley: CoreWeave fällt, Amazon gewinnt – Wie die Midterms den KI-Sektor spaltentechnology stocks (Tech)
US-Bören: CoreWeave fällt, Amazon gewinnt – Wie die Midterms den KI-Sektor spaltentechnology stocks (Tech)
Börsen: Midterms lösen Erholungsrally in den USA aus – KI-Aktien fallen trotzdemUSA
Börsen: KI-Aktien fallen nach Midterms in den USA: sichere Anlagen gefragtNASDAQ

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does AIamond measure source reliability?▼
AI classifies the tone of each article as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication, we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so we compare it with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, give a 95 % interval (resampling whole days) and correct for testing many sources at once (Holm). The method is registered with its SHA-256 and never edited; a change is a new version, listed in the change log.
Can you rely on Handelsblatt to call the market?▼
Handelsblatt was right 34.3% of the time over 3,312 checks; chance for the same calls in the same markets is 34.7%. Verdict: Not distinguishable from chance. Across all sources we track, the tone of headlines has so far not called the next move better than chance – which is why AIamond shows the news picture, not forecasts.
How many news sources does AIamond track?▼
We read news sources whose rights record admits them: official feeds of publishers, no aggregators, press-release wires or user posts. The current list with every source's numbers is on this page.
How often is the reliability data updated?▼
Price checks run daily; the record on this page is recomputed once a day from the stored checks.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.