AIamond
Head-to-Head Comparison

Dagens IndustrivsInvestors Business Daily

Dagens Industri (35.8% hit rate) vs Investors Business Daily (37.0% hit rate): how often each source’s headline tone matched the later price move.

Neither did better against chance than the other

Based on 2891 and 600 checked headlines

Dagens Industri

Ranked #7 of — sources

Metric
Investors Business Daily

Ranked #5 of — sources

Hit rate

35.8%vs37.0%

Checked reports

2,891vs600

Articles Analyzed

2,010vs405

Avg. Relevance

-vs-

Sentiment & Bias Analysis

How bullish or bearish each source’s headlines tend to be.

Sentiment Distribution

Dagens Industri

Avg. Sentiment: -0.09
Bullish 41%Neutral 5%Bearish 54%

Investors Business Daily

Avg. Sentiment: 0.01
Bullish 52%Neutral 2%Bearish 45%

Market Context Coverage

Hit rate by marketDagens IndustriInvestors Business Daily
AB Volvo1 (0%)—
ABB2 (0%)—
AMD—1 (0%)
Academedia1 (0%)—
Accenture—1 (0%)
Acroud1 (0%)—
Adobe—1 (0%)
Airline1 (0%)—
Alfa Laval3 (0%)—
Alleima1 (0%)—
Alleimaas1 (0%)—
Alstom, French rail manufacturer1 (0%)—
Amazon1 (0%)—
Anthropic IPO—1 (0%)
Anthropic valuation1 (0%)—
Apotea1 (0%)—
Apotea, Swedish online pharmacy1 (0%)—
Apple—1 (0%)
Argentine economy1 (0%)—
Argenx—1 (0%)
Ascelia Pharma1 (0%)—
Asian stocks98 (7%)—
AstraZeneca3 (0%)—
Atlas Copco3 (0%)—
Atrium Ljungberg2 (0%)—
Audi/Volkswagen1 (0%)—
Australian stocks1 (0%)—
Autoliv2 (0%)—
Avensia1 (0%)—
Axfood1 (0%)—
BE Group1 (0%)—
Bank of America1 (0%)—
Beijer Ref1 (0%)—
Bico1 (0%)—
Binance1 (0%)—
Biogaia1 (0%)—
Biogaia, Swedish probiotics company1 (0%)—
Biohaven—1 (0%)
Biotech—2 (1%)
Bitcoin8 (1%)11 (3%)
Bloom Energy—1 (0%)
Boeing2 (0%)2 (1%)
Boozt1 (0%)—
Bravida1 (0%)—
Brazilian1 (0%)—
CTEK1 (0%)—
Camparis1 (0%)—
Canada-US trade negotiations1 (0%)—
Canada-USA trade1 (0%)—
Carrefour1 (0%)—
Catena, Swedish1 (0%)—
Cellavision1 (0%)—
Chinese Robotics—1 (0%)
Chinese credit1 (0%)—
Chinese economy1 (0%)—
Chinese financial markets1 (0%)—
Cisco—1 (0%)
Clas Ohlson3 (0%)—
Clear Secure, a single—1 (0%)
Cloetta1 (0%)—
Coinbase—2 (1%)
Copper2 (0%)—
Crocs1 (0%)—
CrowdStrike—1 (0%)
DAX12 (1%)3 (1%)
Danish economy1 (0%)—
Dell Technologies—1 (0%)
DoorDash—2 (1%)
DraftKings—1 (0%)
Dynavox1 (0%)—
Dyrgripen1 (0%)—
EUR/USD5 (0%)—
Electrolux2 (0%)—
Eli Lilly—1 (0%)
Ellos1 (0%)—
Enrad1 (0%)—
Epiroc2 (0%)—
Ericsson3 (0%)—
Essity1 (0%)—
Essitys1 (0%)—
European stocks267 (18%)2 (1%)
Evolution AB1 (0%)—
Faeth Therapeutics—1 (0%)
Ferrari1 (0%)—
Finnair1 (0%)—
French government bonds1 (0%)—
GBP/USD1 (0%)—
GE Vernova—1 (0%)
Getinge1 (0%)—
Gold7 (1%)2 (1%)
Grail Inc—1 (0%)
H&M4 (0%)—
HMS Networks1 (0%)—
HP1 (0%)—
HPE—1 (0%)
Handelsbanken, Swedish bank1 (0%)—
Harmony Biosciences—1 (0%)
Heba real estate1 (0%)—
Hemnet1 (0%)—
Hernö Gin1 (0%)—
Hexagon1 (0%)—
Hexagon AB1 (0%)—
Hospital—1 (0%)
Hufvudstaden AB1 (0%)—
Husqvarna1 (0%)—
Höganäs AB1 (0%)—
IAG/airline1 (0%)—
IPO1 (0%)—
Indian stocks6 (0%)—
Indonesian1 (0%)—
Intel1 (0%)—
Intrum1 (0%)—
Intuit—1 (0%)
Intuitive Surgical—1 (0%)
Ionis Pharma—1 (0%)
Iron ore/Commodities1 (0%)—
JM AB1 (0%)—
Japanese stocks10 (1%)—
Junk Bond ETF—1 (0%)
Kinnevik3 (0%)—
Klarna3 (0%)—
Konecranes1 (0%)—
LVMH1 (0%)—
Lockheed Martin—1 (0%)
Loomis1 (0%)—
Lululemon1 (0%)—
Luxury goods sector1 (0%)—
Lyko1 (0%)—
Medtronic—1 (0%)
Mercedes-Benz1 (0%)—
Micro Systemation1 (0%)—
Micron Technology—1 (0%)
Microsoft—1 (0%)
Moderna—1 (0%)
Munters AB1 (0%)—
Mycronic1 (0%)—
NASDAQ62 (4%)25 (7%)
Natural Gas—1 (0%)
Netflix1 (0%)5 (1%)
New Wave2 (0%)—
Nibe1 (0%)—
Nibe AB1 (0%)—
Nibe Industrier, Swedish1 (0%)—
Noba Bank1 (0%)—
Nordea3 (0%)—
Nordnet/Avanza1 (0%)—
Nordson Corp—1 (0%)
Norwegian electricity1 (0%)—
Norwegian markets1 (0%)—
Norwegian salmon1 (0%)—
Novartis1 (0%)—
Novo Nordisk2 (0%)—
Nscale IPO1 (0%)—
Nvidia1 (0%)1 (0%)
Oil123 (8%)14 (4%)
Okta / cybersecurity—1 (0%)
Opera Software—1 (0%)
Oracle—1 (0%)
Ortelius International1 (0%)—
Palo Alto Networks—1 (0%)
PayPal1 (0%)2 (1%)
PepsiCo1 (0%)—
Pfizer—1 (0%)
Polestar1 (0%)—
Porsche1 (0%)—
Qben Infra1 (0%)—
Rejlers1 (0%)—
Retail—1 (0%)
Robinhood—5 (1%)
Rocket Lab—2 (1%)
Rubrik—1 (0%)
Rusta1 (0%)—
Röko AB1 (0%)—
SBB1 (0%)—
SCA Group1 (0%)—
SEB3 (0%)—
SEK2 (0%)—
SK Hynix2 (0%)—
SKF AB1 (0%)—
SSAB3 (0%)—
Saab2 (0%)—
Samsara—1 (0%)
Sandvik3 (0%)—
Scandi Standards1 (0%)—
Schneider Electric1 (0%)—
Seagate Technology—1 (0%)
Sectra1 (0%)—
Securitas AB3 (0%)—
Semtech—1 (0%)
SentinelOne—1 (0%)
SharkNinja—1 (0%)
Silver3 (0%)—
Sinch2 (0%)—
Skanska1 (0%)—
Skistar1 (0%)—
Smart Eye AB1 (0%)—
SoFi Technologies—1 (0%)
Sobi1 (0%)—
SpaceX1 (0%)2 (1%)
Spotify1 (0%)—
Stillfront AB1 (0%)—
Stockholm Stock Exchange13 (1%)—
Stockholm stock exchange1 (0%)—
Stora Enso1 (0%)—
Storytel3 (0%)—
Studsvik1 (0%)—
Sweco1 (0%)—
Swedencare1 (0%)—
Swedish21 (1%)—
Swedish Krona1 (0%)—
Swedish Real Estate1 (0%)—
Swedish automotive supply chain1 (0%)—
Swedish betting sector1 (0%)—
Swedish construction sector1 (0%)—
Swedish defense1 (0%)—
Swedish economy3 (0%)—
Swedish electricity1 (0%)—
Swedish forestry sector1 (0%)—
Swedish fuel1 (0%)—
Swedish gaming1 (0%)—
Swedish golf restaurant sector1 (0%)—
Swedish grocery retail1 (0%)—
Swedish housing7 (1%)—
Swedish individual1 (0%)—
Swedish inflation2 (0%)—
Swedish interest rates6 (0%)—
Swedish markets1 (0%)—
Swedish mining1 (0%)—
Swedish mining equipment1 (0%)—
Swedish real estate5 (0%)—
Swedish rental housing1 (0%)—
Swedish sawmill industry1 (0%)—
Swedish stock4 (0%)—
Swedish venture capital1 (0%)—
Swiss1 (0%)—
Taiwan stock1 (0%)—
Target Corporation—1 (0%)
Tech2 (0%)—
Tele21 (0%)—
Telecom—1 (0%)
Teqnion1 (0%)—
Tesla1 (0%)10 (3%)
Teva Pharma—1 (0%)
Thule1 (0%)—
Thule AB1 (0%)—
Tieto AB1 (0%)—
Traton2 (0%)—
Traton AG1 (0%)—
Traton/Scania1 (0%)—
Trelleborg2 (0%)—
Troax1 (0%)—
Truecaller2 (0%)—
Turkish1 (0%)—
Tången1 (0%)—
UK markets25 (2%)—
US-Canada trade1 (0%)—
USA330 (22%)114 (31%)
USD/JPY7 (1%)—
Uber—1 (0%)
UniQure—1 (0%)
Vera—1 (0%)
Verisure1 (0%)—
Viatris—1 (0%)
Victoria's Secret—1 (0%)
Volvo Cars7 (1%)—
Wendy's1 (0%)—
Wisa1 (0%)—
Workday—1 (0%)
Xspray1 (0%)—
Zoom—1 (0%)
airline ticket1 (0%)—
aviation manufacturers1 (0%)—
bank1 (0%)—
cell tower operator—1 (0%)
consumer finance—1 (0%)
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)2 (0%)4 (1%)
food2 (0%)—
gaming company1 (0%)—
global markets57 (4%)4 (1%)
hard drive—1 (0%)
hotel1 (0%)—
interest-rate expectations1 (0%)—
iron ore1 (0%)—
mining company1 (0%)—
quantum computing—1 (0%)
technology stocks (Tech)147 (10%)96 (26%)
unnamed Swedish high-dividend1 (0%)—
unnamed company1 (0%)—
uranium—1 (0%)
used car—1 (0%)

See today's news picture — not a forecast

A short, free daily e-mail with the most relevant market news and which way the coverage leans, with sources.

Get Free AI Market Insights

The news picture for your markets, read by AI. Free, no credit card required.

AI-Analysed Market Trends

Browse the analysed trends for free

Your Own Dashboard

Watchlists and the News Picture, whenever you check

How often the news was right

Each source’s hit rate, compared with chance

By signing up you get the free daily news digest by e-mail. We only send offers if you explicitly allow it. Unsubscribe any time. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable: Dagens Industri or Investors Business Daily?▼
Dagens Industri (35.8%) and Investors Business Daily (37.0%) get the same verdict against chance, measured from the first tradable price. A raw hit rate mostly reflects which markets a source covers, so a gap between the two rates alone says little.
How are these comparisons calculated?▼
AI rates each headline’s tone as up, down or sideways for its market. From the first price a reader could trade we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days, and compare each source’s hit rate with chance for its own mix of calls (method on /how-reliable-is). Sources are compared on that verdict, their tone mix and the markets they cover.
What markets do Dagens Industri and Investors Business Daily both cover?▼
They share 16 market contexts: Bitcoin, Boeing, DAX, European stocks, Gold, NASDAQ, Netflix, Nvidia, Oil, PayPal, SpaceX, Tesla, USA, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Each source may also cover additional markets independently.

Our Methodology

AI classifies each article's tone as up, down or sideways for the market it covers. From the first price a reader could trade after publication we check the move after 1, 3 and 7 days. A source's hit rate is compared with chance for the same calls and outcomes within each market, so covering calm or busy markets earns nothing. Each difference comes with a 95 % interval; checks close in time are resampled together in blocks of 7 or 14 days, because they share market moves. A verdict needs at least 300 checks and must hold after correcting for the number of sources tested (Holm). This answers "did the market move that way?": a hit rate, not a return. AIamond makes no forecasts of its own.