AIamond
Direktvergleich

CNBCvsDagens Industri

CNBC (38.6 % Trefferquote) vs. Dagens Industri (35.8 % Trefferquote): wie oft der Schlagzeilen-Ton jeder Quelle zur späteren Kursbewegung passte.

Keine schnitt gegen den Zufall besser ab als die andere

Basierend auf 3910 bzw. 2891 geprüften Schlagzeilen

CNBC

Rang #3 von — Quellen

Kennzahl
Dagens Industri

Rang #7 von — Quellen

Trefferquote

38.6%vs35.8%

Geprüfte Meldungen

3,910vs2,891

Analysierte Artikel

1,937vs2,010

Durchschn. Relevanz

-vs-

Stimmungs- & Tendenzanalyse

Wie bullisch oder bärisch die Schlagzeilen jeder Quelle tendenziell sind.

Stimmungsverteilung

CNBC

Durchschn. Stimmung: 0.02
Bullisch 51%Neutral 5%Bärisch 45%

Dagens Industri

Durchschn. Stimmung: -0.09
Bullisch 41%Neutral 5%Bärisch 54%

Marktkontext-Abdeckung

Trefferquote nach MarktCNBCDagens Industri
AB Volvo—1 (0%)
ABB—2 (0%)
AST SpaceMobile1 (0%)—
AT&T1 (0%)—
Academedia—1 (0%)
Acroud—1 (0%)
Adobe, single software1 (0%)—
Affirm Holdings1 (0%)—
Airline1 (0%)1 (0%)
Alfa Laval—3 (0%)
Alleima—1 (0%)
Alleimaas—1 (0%)
Alstom, French rail manufacturer—1 (0%)
Aluminum2 (0%)—
Amazon4 (0%)1 (0%)
Anthropic valuation—1 (0%)
Apotea—1 (0%)
Apotea, Swedish online pharmacy—1 (0%)
Apple2 (0%)—
Argentine economy—1 (0%)
Ascelia Pharma—1 (0%)
Asian stocks51 (3%)98 (7%)
AstraZeneca—3 (0%)
Atlas Copco—3 (0%)
Atrium Ljungberg—2 (0%)
Audi/Volkswagen—1 (0%)
Australian stocks6 (0%)1 (0%)
Autoliv—2 (0%)
Automotive industry1 (0%)—
Autonomous driving1 (0%)—
Avensia—1 (0%)
Axfood—1 (0%)
BE Group—1 (0%)
BNB1 (0%)—
Baidu1 (0%)—
Bank of America—1 (0%)
Beijer Ref—1 (0%)
Berkshire Hathaway1 (0%)—
Bico—1 (0%)
Binance—1 (0%)
Biogaia—1 (0%)
Biogaia, Swedish probiotics company—1 (0%)
Biogen1 (0%)—
Biotech1 (0%)—
Bitcoin25 (2%)8 (1%)
Block Inc1 (0%)—
Boeing—2 (0%)
Booking Holdings1 (0%)—
Boozt—1 (0%)
Bravida—1 (0%)
Brazilian2 (0%)1 (0%)
Brazilian real1 (0%)—
CTEK—1 (0%)
CVS Health, healthcare/managed care1 (0%)—
Camparis—1 (0%)
Canada-US trade negotiations—1 (0%)
Canada-USA trade—1 (0%)
Carrefour—1 (0%)
Catena, Swedish—1 (0%)
Cellavision—1 (0%)
ChargePoint1 (0%)—
China industrial profits1 (0%)—
China trade data1 (0%)—
Chinese biopharma1 (0%)—
Chinese credit—1 (0%)
Chinese economy1 (0%)1 (0%)
Chinese financial markets—1 (0%)
Chipotle Mexican Grill1 (0%)—
Clas Ohlson—3 (0%)
Cloetta—1 (0%)
Coinbase1 (0%)—
Commodities1 (0%)—
Copper3 (0%)2 (0%)
CoreWeave4 (0%)—
Crocs—1 (0%)
DAX7 (0%)12 (1%)
Danish economy—1 (0%)
Dell Technologies2 (0%)—
Dynavox—1 (0%)
Dyrgripen—1 (0%)
EUR/USD3 (0%)5 (0%)
Electrolux—2 (0%)
Eli Lilly1 (0%)—
Ellos—1 (0%)
Enrad—1 (0%)
Epiroc—2 (0%)
Ericsson—3 (0%)
Essity—1 (0%)
Essitys—1 (0%)
Etsy1 (0%)—
European stocks57 (3%)267 (18%)
Evolution AB—1 (0%)
Expedia Group1 (0%)—
Ferrari1 (0%)1 (0%)
Finnair—1 (0%)
Ford Motor Company1 (0%)—
Fortinet1 (0%)—
French government bonds1 (0%)1 (0%)
GBP/USD1 (0%)1 (0%)
Generac Holdings1 (0%)—
Getinge—1 (0%)
Gold34 (2%)7 (1%)
H&M—4 (0%)
HMS Networks—1 (0%)
HP—1 (0%)
Handelsbanken, Swedish bank—1 (0%)
Hanwha Ocean1 (0%)—
Heba real estate—1 (0%)
Hemnet—1 (0%)
Hernö Gin—1 (0%)
Hewlett Packard Enterprise1 (0%)—
Hexagon—1 (0%)
Hexagon AB—1 (0%)
Homebuilder1 (0%)—
Hufvudstaden AB—1 (0%)
Husqvarna—1 (0%)
Hybe1 (0%)—
Höganäs AB—1 (0%)
IAG/airline—1 (0%)
IPO—1 (0%)
Iceland EU vote1 (0%)—
Indian stocks23 (1%)6 (0%)
Indonesian—1 (0%)
Intel—1 (0%)
Intrum—1 (0%)
Iron ore/Commodities—1 (0%)
JM AB—1 (0%)
Japanese stocks20 (1%)10 (1%)
JetBlue1 (0%)—
Johnson & Johnson1 (0%)—
Kinnevik—3 (0%)
Klarna—3 (0%)
Konecranes—1 (0%)
Korean1 (0%)—
LVMH—1 (0%)
Lithium1 (0%)—
Loomis—1 (0%)
Lucid Motors1 (0%)—
Lululemon—1 (0%)
Luxury goods sector—1 (0%)
Luxury sector2 (0%)—
Lyko—1 (0%)
MGM Resorts1 (0%)—
Madison Air IPO1 (0%)—
Mastercard1 (0%)—
MaxLinear1 (0%)—
Mercedes-Benz—1 (0%)
Meta Platforms2 (0%)—
Micro Systemation—1 (0%)
Micron Technology1 (0%)—
Microsoft1 (0%)—
Municipal Bonds1 (0%)—
Munters AB—1 (0%)
Mycronic—1 (0%)
NASDAQ48 (3%)62 (4%)
Netflix2 (0%)1 (0%)
New Wave—2 (0%)
New Zealand exporters1 (0%)—
Nibe—1 (0%)
Nibe AB—1 (0%)
Nibe Industrier, Swedish—1 (0%)
Nike3 (0%)—
Noba Bank—1 (0%)
Nordea—3 (0%)
Nordnet/Avanza—1 (0%)
Norwegian electricity—1 (0%)
Norwegian markets—1 (0%)
Norwegian salmon—1 (0%)
Novartis—1 (0%)
Novo Nordisk2 (0%)2 (0%)
Nscale IPO—1 (0%)
Nvidia1 (0%)1 (0%)
Oil306 (18%)123 (8%)
Oracle2 (0%)—
Ortelius International—1 (0%)
Palantir2 (0%)—
Palantir Technologies1 (0%)—
Paramount/Warner Bros merger1 (0%)—
PayPal—1 (0%)
Peloton1 (0%)—
Penguin Solutions1 (0%)—
PepsiCo1 (0%)1 (0%)
Pharmaceutical1 (0%)—
Pharmaceutical ETF1 (0%)—
Polestar—1 (0%)
Pop Mart1 (0%)—
Porsche—1 (0%)
Private Credit1 (0%)—
Qantas1 (0%)—
Qben Infra—1 (0%)
Refiner1 (0%)—
Rejlers—1 (0%)
Restaurant Brands International1 (0%)—
Restaurant industry1 (0%)—
Riot Platforms1 (0%)—
Rivian2 (0%)—
Robinhood2 (0%)—
Roku1 (0%)—
Royal Caribbean Cruises1 (0%)—
Rusta—1 (0%)
Röko AB—1 (0%)
SBB—1 (0%)
SCA Group—1 (0%)
SEB—3 (0%)
SEK—2 (0%)
SK Hynix1 (0%)2 (0%)
SKF AB—1 (0%)
SSAB—3 (0%)
Saab—2 (0%)
Salesforce1 (0%)—
Samsung Electronics1 (0%)—
Sandvik—3 (0%)
Saudi Aramco1 (0%)—
Scandi Standards—1 (0%)
Schneider Electric—1 (0%)
Sectra—1 (0%)
Securitas AB—3 (0%)
Seven & i Holdings1 (0%)—
Sherwin-Williams1 (0%)—
Silver4 (0%)3 (0%)
Sinch—2 (0%)
Skanska—1 (0%)
Skistar—1 (0%)
Smart Eye AB—1 (0%)
SoFi Technologies1 (0%)—
Sobi—1 (0%)
South Korean rates1 (0%)—
South Korean solar1 (0%)—
SpaceX—1 (0%)
SpaceX IPO1 (0%)—
Spotify—1 (0%)
Stillfront AB—1 (0%)
Stockholm Stock Exchange—13 (1%)
Stockholm stock exchange—1 (0%)
Stora Enso—1 (0%)
Storytel—3 (0%)
Studsvik—1 (0%)
Sweco—1 (0%)
Swedencare—1 (0%)
Swedish—21 (1%)
Swedish Krona—1 (0%)
Swedish Real Estate—1 (0%)
Swedish automotive supply chain—1 (0%)
Swedish betting sector—1 (0%)
Swedish construction sector—1 (0%)
Swedish defense—1 (0%)
Swedish economy—3 (0%)
Swedish electricity—1 (0%)
Swedish forestry sector—1 (0%)
Swedish fuel—1 (0%)
Swedish gaming—1 (0%)
Swedish golf restaurant sector—1 (0%)
Swedish grocery retail—1 (0%)
Swedish housing—7 (1%)
Swedish individual—1 (0%)
Swedish inflation—2 (0%)
Swedish interest rates—6 (0%)
Swedish markets—1 (0%)
Swedish mining—1 (0%)
Swedish mining equipment—1 (0%)
Swedish real estate—5 (0%)
Swedish rental housing—1 (0%)
Swedish sawmill industry—1 (0%)
Swedish stock—4 (0%)
Swedish venture capital—1 (0%)
Swiss—1 (0%)
Swiss Franc2 (0%)—
Taiwan economy1 (0%)—
Taiwan stock—1 (0%)
Take-Two Interactive1 (0%)—
Tapestry Inc1 (0%)—
Target Corp1 (0%)—
Tech—2 (0%)
Tele2—1 (0%)
Teqnion—1 (0%)
Tesla2 (0%)1 (0%)
Thule—1 (0%)
Thule AB—1 (0%)
Tieto AB—1 (0%)
Traton—2 (0%)
Traton AG—1 (0%)
Traton/Scania—1 (0%)
Trelleborg—2 (0%)
Troax—1 (0%)
Truecaller—2 (0%)
Turkish1 (0%)1 (0%)
Tången—1 (0%)
UK markets21 (1%)25 (2%)
US Banking Sector1 (0%)—
US apartment rents1 (0%)—
US mortgage rates1 (0%)—
US-Canada trade—1 (0%)
US-China summit expectations1 (0%)—
USA462 (27%)330 (22%)
USD2 (0%)—
USD/JPY15 (1%)7 (1%)
Union Pacific1 (0%)—
Utilities sector1 (0%)—
Verisure—1 (0%)
Visa1 (0%)—
Volvo Cars—7 (1%)
Walmart1 (0%)—
Wendy's2 (0%)1 (0%)
West Pharma1 (0%)—
Wisa—1 (0%)
Xpeng1 (0%)—
Xspray—1 (0%)
Zebra Technologies1 (0%)—
airline ticket—1 (0%)
aviation manufacturers—1 (0%)
bank—1 (0%)
biotech1 (0%)—
bond1 (0%)—
consumer stock/haircare sector1 (0%)—
cryptocurrencies (Crypto)15 (1%)2 (0%)
data storage manufacturer1 (0%)—
defense industry1 (0%)—
food—2 (0%)
gaming company—1 (0%)
global markets136 (8%)57 (4%)
home furnishings1 (0%)—
hotel—1 (0%)
interest-rate expectations—1 (0%)
iron ore—1 (0%)
memory1 (0%)—
mining company—1 (0%)
natural gas pipeline operators1 (0%)—
prediction markets / Robinhood1 (0%)—
retail1 (0%)—
small-cap1 (0%)—
software stock / Salesforce1 (0%)—
technology stocks (Tech)315 (19%)147 (10%)
unnamed Swedish high-dividend—1 (0%)
unnamed company—1 (0%)
uranium1 (0%)—

Die heutige Nachrichtenlage – keine Prognose

Eine kurze, kostenlose tägliche Mail mit den wichtigsten Marktmeldungen und ihrer Tendenz, mit Quellen.

Kostenlose KI-Markteinblicke erhalten

Die Nachrichtenlage Ihrer Märkte, von KI gelesen. Kostenlos, keine Kreditkarte nötig.

KI-analysierte Markttrends

Die analysierten Trends kostenlos ansehen

Ihr eigenes Dashboard

Watchlists und die Nachrichtenlage, wann immer Sie nachsehen

Wie oft die Nachrichten richtig lagen

Die Trefferquote jeder Quelle im Vergleich zum Zufall

Mit der Anmeldung erhalten Sie den kostenlosen täglichen Nachrichten-Digest per E-Mail. Angebote schicken wir nur, wenn Sie das ausdrücklich erlauben. Abmelden jederzeit. Siehe unsere Datenschutzerklärung und Nutzungsbedingungen.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Was ist zuverlässiger: CNBC oder Dagens Industri?▼
CNBC (38.6 %) und Dagens Industri (35.8 %) erhalten dasselbe Urteil gegen den Zufall, gemessen ab dem ersten handelbaren Kurs. Eine reine Trefferquote spiegelt vor allem, welche Märkte eine Quelle abdeckt; der Abstand der beiden Quoten allein sagt wenig.
Wie werden diese Vergleiche berechnet?▼
Eine KI ordnet den Tenor jeder Schlagzeile für ihren Markt als steigend, fallend oder seitwärts ein. Ab dem ersten Kurs, zu dem ein Leser hätte handeln können, prüfen wir die Bewegung nach 1, 3 und 7 Tagen und vergleichen die Trefferquote jeder Quelle mit dem Zufall für ihre eigene Mischung (Methode unter /how-reliable-is). Verglichen werden dieses Urteil, die Tenor-Verteilung und die abgedeckten Märkte.
Welche Märkte decken CNBC und Dagens Industri gemeinsam ab?▼
Sie teilen 34 Marktkontexte: Airline, Amazon, Asian stocks, Australian stocks, Bitcoin, Brazilian, Chinese economy, Copper, DAX, EUR/USD, European stocks, Ferrari, French government bonds, GBP/USD, Gold, Indian stocks, Japanese stocks, NASDAQ, Netflix, Novo Nordisk, Nvidia, Oil, PepsiCo, SK Hynix, Silver, Tesla, Turkish, UK markets, USA, USD/JPY, Wendy's, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Jede Quelle kann auch zusätzliche Märkte unabhängig abdecken.

Unsere Methodik

Eine KI ordnet den Tenor jedes Artikels für den behandelten Markt als steigend, fallend oder seitwärts ein. Ab dem ersten Kurs, zu dem ein Leser nach der Veröffentlichung hätte handeln können, prüfen wir die Bewegung nach 1, 3 und 7 Tagen. Die Trefferquote einer Quelle wird mit dem Zufall für dieselben Einschätzungen und Ergebnisse innerhalb jedes Marktes verglichen; wer über ruhige oder bewegte Märkte schreibt, gewinnt dadurch nichts. Jeder Abstand hat ein 95-%-Intervall; zeitlich nahe Prüfungen werden in Blöcken von 7 oder 14 Tagen gemeinsam neu gezogen, weil sie Marktbewegungen teilen. Ein Urteil braucht mindestens 300 Prüfungen und muss auch nach der Korrektur für die Zahl der getesteten Quellen (Holm) bestehen. Das beantwortet „Bewegte sich der Markt so?“: eine Trefferquote, keine Rendite. AIamond selbst macht keine Prognosen.