Comparaison directe
CNBCvswallstreet-online Nachrichten
CNBC (38.6 % de réussite) vs wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8 % de réussite) : à quelle fréquence le ton des titres de chaque source a correspondu au mouvement de prix suivant.
Aucune ne s'en sort mieux face au hasard que l'autre
Basé sur 3910 et 1181 titres vérifiés
Taux de réussite
38.6%vs36.8%
Infos vérifiées
3,910vs1,181
Articles Analysés
1,937vs651
Pertinence Moyenne
-vs-
Analyse du sentiment et des biais
Dans quelle mesure les titres de chaque source tendent à être haussiers ou baissiers.
Distribution du sentiment
CNBC
Sentiment moyen: 0.02
Haussier 51%Neutre 5%Baissier 45%
wallstreet-online Nachrichten
Sentiment moyen: 0.00
Haussier 47%Neutre 3%Baissier 50%
Couverture des contextes de marché
| Taux de réussite par marché | CNBC | wallstreet-online Nachrichten |
|---|---|---|
| ASOS | — | 1 (0%) |
| AST SpaceMobile | 1 (0%) | — |
| AT&S | — | 1 (0%) |
| AT&T | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| AXA | — | 1 (0%) |
| Adobe | — | 1 (0%) |
| Adobe, single software | 1 (0%) | — |
| Affirm Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Airbus | — | 2 (0%) |
| Airline | 1 (0%) | — |
| Aixtron | — | 1 (0%) |
| Alibaba | — | 3 (1%) |
| Alibaba/Chinese Tech | — | 1 (0%) |
| Allianz | — | 2 (0%) |
| Alphabet | — | 1 (0%) |
| Aluminum | 2 (0%) | — |
| Amazon | 4 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| American Express | — | 1 (0%) |
| AppLovin | — | 1 (0%) |
| Apple | 2 (0%) | 3 (1%) |
| Asian stocks | 51 (3%) | 3 (1%) |
| Australian stocks | 6 (0%) | 3 (1%) |
| Auto1 Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| Automotive industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| Autonomous driving | 1 (0%) | — |
| Aviation/Transport | — | 1 (0%) |
| BMW | — | 1 (0%) |
| BNB | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| BYD | — | 3 (1%) |
| Baidu | 1 (0%) | — |
| Bank | — | 1 (0%) |
| Bayer | — | 1 (0%) |
| Berkshire Hathaway | 1 (0%) | — |
| BioNTech | — | 2 (0%) |
| Biogen | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Biotech | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Bitcoin | 25 (2%) | 21 (3%) |
| BlackRock | — | 1 (0%) |
| Block Inc | 1 (0%) | — |
| Booking Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Brazilian | 2 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Brazilian Real | — | 2 (0%) |
| Brazilian real | 1 (0%) | — |
| Bulgarian | — | 1 (0%) |
| CVS Health, healthcare/managed care | 1 (0%) | — |
| Canadian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Cannabis | — | 2 (0%) |
| Carrefour | — | 1 (0%) |
| ChargePoint | 1 (0%) | — |
| China industrial profits | 1 (0%) | — |
| China trade data | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese biopharma | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese economy | 1 (0%) | — |
| Chinese solar sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill | 1 (0%) | — |
| Coca-Cola | — | 1 (0%) |
| Coinbase | 1 (0%) | — |
| Commodities | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Copper | 3 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| CoreWeave | 4 (0%) | — |
| D-Wave | — | 1 (0%) |
| DAX | 7 (0%) | 54 (8%) |
| DHL Group | — | 1 (0%) |
| Daimler Truck | — | 1 (0%) |
| Dell Technologies | 2 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Deutsche Bank | — | 2 (0%) |
| Deutsche Telekom | — | 3 (1%) |
| EUR/USD | 3 (0%) | 4 (1%) |
| Eli Lilly | 1 (0%) | — |
| EssilorLuxottica | — | 1 (0%) |
| Estée Lauder | — | 1 (0%) |
| Ethereum | — | 1 (0%) |
| Etsy | 1 (0%) | — |
| European natural gas | — | 1 (0%) |
| European stocks | 57 (3%) | 40 (6%) |
| Evotec | — | 1 (0%) |
| Expedia Group | 1 (0%) | — |
| Ferrari | 1 (0%) | — |
| Ford Motor Company | 1 (0%) | — |
| Fortinet | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| French government bonds | 1 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| GBP/USD | 1 (0%) | — |
| Generac Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| General Motors | — | 1 (0%) |
| Gold | 34 (2%) | 28 (4%) |
| HP | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hanwha Ocean | 1 (0%) | — |
| Hapag-Lloyd | — | 1 (0%) |
| HelloFresh | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hensoldt AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hewlett Packard Enterprise | 1 (0%) | — |
| Homebuilder | 1 (0%) | — |
| Honda | — | 1 (0%) |
| Honeywell Aerospace | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hungarian markets | — | 1 (0%) |
| Hybe | 1 (0%) | — |
| IBM | — | 1 (0%) |
| IMAX | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iambic Therapeutics | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iceland EU vote | 1 (0%) | — |
| Indian stocks | 23 (1%) | 3 (1%) |
| IonQ | — | 1 (0%) |
| Iranian Rial | — | 1 (0%) |
| Jakarta Stock Exchange | — | 1 (0%) |
| Japanese stocks | 20 (1%) | 2 (0%) |
| JetBlue | 1 (0%) | — |
| Johnson & Johnson | 1 (0%) | — |
| Korean | 1 (0%) | — |
| Kraft Heinz | — | 1 (0%) |
| Kupfermarkt | — | 1 (0%) |
| Leonardo | — | 1 (0%) |
| Lithium | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Lockheed Martin | — | 2 (0%) |
| Lucid Motors | 1 (0%) | — |
| Lufthansa stock, aviation sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| Luxury sector | 2 (0%) | — |
| MGM Resorts | 1 (0%) | — |
| Madison Air IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mastercard | 1 (0%) | — |
| MaxLinear | 1 (0%) | — |
| Mensch und Maschine | — | 1 (0%) |
| Meta Platforms | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Micron | — | 1 (0%) |
| Micron Technology | 1 (0%) | — |
| Microsoft | 1 (0%) | — |
| MiniMax | — | 1 (0%) |
| Moderna | — | 1 (0%) |
| Municipal Bonds | 1 (0%) | — |
| NASDAQ | 48 (3%) | 16 (3%) |
| Nanexa | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nebius Group | — | 2 (0%) |
| NetApp | — | 1 (0%) |
| Netflix | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| New Zealand exporters | 1 (0%) | — |
| NextDC | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nike | 3 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Nordex | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nordex AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Novo Nordisk, pharmaceutical | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nscale IPO | — | 1 (0%) |
| Nvidia | 1 (0%) | — |
| Oil | 306 (18%) | 96 (15%) |
| Oracle | 2 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Palantir | 2 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Palantir Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| Palantir stock, analyst rating | — | 1 (0%) |
| Palfinger | — | 2 (0%) |
| Palo Alto Networks | — | 1 (0%) |
| Paramount/Warner Bros merger | 1 (0%) | — |
| PayPal | — | 2 (0%) |
| Peloton | 1 (0%) | — |
| Penguin Solutions | 1 (0%) | — |
| PepsiCo | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pharmaceutical | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pharmaceutical ETF | 1 (0%) | — |
| Pop Mart | 1 (0%) | — |
| Private Credit | 1 (0%) | — |
| Procter & Gamble | — | 2 (0%) |
| Puma SE | — | 1 (0%) |
| Qantas | 1 (0%) | — |
| RWE | — | 1 (0%) |
| Redcare Pharmacy | — | 1 (0%) |
| Refiner | 1 (0%) | — |
| Renk AG | — | 2 (0%) |
| Restaurant Brands International | 1 (0%) | — |
| Restaurant industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| Rheinmetall | — | 1 (0%) |
| Rheinmetall / defense technology | — | 1 (0%) |
| Riot Platforms | 1 (0%) | — |
| Rivian | 2 (0%) | — |
| Rivian stock, EV maker | — | 1 (0%) |
| Robinhood | 2 (0%) | — |
| Roku | 1 (0%) | — |
| Royal Caribbean Cruises | 1 (0%) | — |
| SAP | — | 1 (0%) |
| SK Hynix | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Saab AB | — | 1 (0%) |
| Salesforce | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Salzgitter AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Samsung Electronics | 1 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Sandisk | — | 1 (0%) |
| Sartorius | — | 1 (0%) |
| Saudi Aramco | 1 (0%) | — |
| Seven & i Holdings | 1 (0%) | — |
| Sherwin-Williams | 1 (0%) | — |
| Shopify-related e-commerce software | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Siemens Energy | — | 3 (1%) |
| Silver | 4 (0%) | 11 (2%) |
| SoFi Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| SoftBank | — | 1 (0%) |
| South Korean | — | 1 (0%) |
| South Korean rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| South Korean solar | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Space sector | — | 1 (0%) |
| SpaceX | — | 1 (0%) |
| SpaceX IPO | 1 (0%) | — |
| Swiss Franc | 2 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Taiwan economy | 1 (0%) | — |
| Take-Two Interactive | 1 (0%) | 2 (0%) |
| Tapestry Inc | 1 (0%) | — |
| Target | — | 1 (0%) |
| Target Corp | 1 (0%) | — |
| Technip Energies | — | 1 (0%) |
| Tesla | 2 (0%) | 3 (1%) |
| Thyssenkrupp | — | 1 (0%) |
| Turkish | 1 (0%) | — |
| UK markets | 21 (1%) | 3 (1%) |
| US Banking Sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| US Real Estate | — | 1 (0%) |
| US Soybean | — | 1 (0%) |
| US apartment rents | 1 (0%) | — |
| US mortgage rates | 1 (0%) | — |
| US-China summit expectations | 1 (0%) | — |
| USA | 462 (27%) | 57 (9%) |
| USD | 2 (0%) | — |
| USD/JPY | 15 (1%) | 1 (0%) |
| Uber Technologies, ride-hailing | — | 1 (0%) |
| Union Pacific | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Uranium | — | 1 (0%) |
| Utilities sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| Verbio AG | — | 1 (0%) |
| Verizon | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vertiv | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vestas Wind Systems | — | 1 (0%) |
| Vincorion | — | 1 (0%) |
| Visa | 1 (0%) | — |
| Vonovia | — | 2 (0%) |
| Walmart | 1 (0%) | — |
| Wendy's | 2 (0%) | — |
| West Pharma | 1 (0%) | — |
| XRP | — | 5 (1%) |
| Xiaomi | — | 1 (0%) |
| Xpeng | 1 (0%) | 1 (0%) |
| Zebra Technologies | 1 (0%) | — |
| Zinc | — | 2 (0%) |
| biotech | 1 (0%) | — |
| bond | 1 (0%) | — |
| consumer stock/haircare sector | 1 (0%) | — |
| cryptocurrencies (Crypto) | 15 (1%) | 7 (1%) |
| data storage manufacturer | 1 (0%) | — |
| defense industry | 1 (0%) | — |
| general | — | 1 (0%) |
| global markets | 136 (8%) | 15 (2%) |
| home furnishings | 1 (0%) | — |
| memory | 1 (0%) | — |
| natural gas pipeline operators | 1 (0%) | — |
| online retail / e-commerce | — | 1 (0%) |
| prediction markets / Robinhood | 1 (0%) | — |
| restaurant | — | 1 (0%) |
| retail | 1 (0%) | — |
| small-cap | 1 (0%) | — |
| software stock / Salesforce | 1 (0%) | — |
| technology stocks (Tech) | 315 (19%) | 98 (15%) |
| uranium | 1 (0%) | — |
La situation de l'actualité aujourd'hui — pas une prévision
Un court e-mail quotidien gratuit avec les informations de marché les plus importantes et leur orientation, sources comprises.
Obtenez des Informations de Marché IA Gratuites
Le tableau de l'actualité de vos marchés, lue par l'IA. Gratuit, sans carte bancaire.
Tendances de marché analysées par l'IA
Consultez gratuitement les tendances analysées
Votre Propre Tableau de Bord
Listes de suivi et l'image de l'actualité, quand vous le souhaitez
À quelle fréquence l'actualité a vu juste
Le taux de réussite de chaque source face au hasard
Questions Fréquemment Posées
Quelle source est la plus fiable : CNBC ou wallstreet-online Nachrichten ?▼
CNBC (38.6 %) et wallstreet-online Nachrichten (36.8 %) reçoivent le même verdict face au hasard, mesuré à partir du premier cours négociable. Un taux de réussite brut reflète surtout les marchés couverts par une source ; l'écart entre les deux taux, seul, dit peu de chose.
Comment ces comparaisons sont-elles calculées ?▼
Une IA classe le ton de chaque titre comme haussier, baissier ou neutre pour son marché. À partir du premier cours auquel un lecteur pouvait négocier, nous vérifions le mouvement après 1, 3 et 7 jours et comparons le taux de réussite de chaque source au hasard pour son propre mélange (méthode sur /how-reliable-is). Sont comparés ce verdict, la répartition des tons et les marchés couverts.
Quels marchés CNBC et wallstreet-online Nachrichten couvrent-ils en commun ?▼
Ils partagent 46 contextes de marché : AT&T, Amazon, Apple, Asian stocks, Australian stocks, BNB, Biogen, Biotech, Bitcoin, Brazilian, Commodities, Copper, DAX, Dell Technologies, EUR/USD, European stocks, Fortinet, French government bonds, Gold, Indian stocks, Japanese stocks, Lithium, Meta Platforms, NASDAQ, Netflix, Nike, Novo Nordisk, Oil, Oracle, Palantir, SK Hynix, Salesforce, Samsung Electronics, Silver, South Korean solar, Swiss Franc, Take-Two Interactive, Tesla, UK markets, USA, USD/JPY, Union Pacific, Xpeng, cryptocurrencies (Crypto), global markets, technology stocks (Tech). Chaque source peut également couvrir des marchés supplémentaires indépendamment.
Notre Méthodologie
Une IA classe le ton de chaque article comme haussier, baissier ou neutre pour le marché concerné. À partir du premier cours auquel un lecteur pouvait négocier après la publication, nous vérifions le mouvement après 1, 3 et 7 jours. Le taux de réussite d'une source est comparé au hasard pour les mêmes appréciations et résultats au sein de chaque marché : couvrir des marchés calmes ou agités ne rapporte rien. Chaque écart a un intervalle à 95 % ; les vérifications proches dans le temps sont rééchantillonnées ensemble par blocs de 7 ou 14 jours, car elles partagent des mouvements de marché. Un verdict exige au moins 300 vérifications et doit tenir après correction pour le nombre de sources testées (Holm). Cela répond à « le marché a-t-il évolué ainsi ? » : un taux de réussite, pas un rendement. AIamond ne fait aucune prévision propre.